In most professions and economic fields, imagination is more important than knowledge
Life is all around you and when you start asking the right questions to it, great ideas emerge. Here the statement says that, in a professional or economic fields, imagination is more important than knowledge. Personally, I agree that imagination is one of the foundations to having a path-breaking idea. A combination of passion and imagination when applied on knowledge, brings out the best ideas of mankind. However, I do tend to disagree with the all or nothing attitude of outright declaring imagination to be more important, because there are many cases where the absence of knowledge can dampen the best of imaginations.
Firstly, humans have always evolved by ideas that have stemmed from imagination and necessity. From the stone age, we had the knowledge but the imagination of rubbing two stones or carving a wheel out of stone helped us achieve the two markers of human development. As time progressed, the old imaginations became the current knowledge, and make us think and imagine harder to solve other quotidian events. This encouraged different visionaries to contribute into the field of science, helping develop the most ground-breaking ideas out of basic curiosity to imagine a solution. If we draw parallels to today’s time, the professional and economic fields have had to evolve at a constant pace, to keep up with the imagination and problem-solving skills of the professionals.
The introduction of TV, radio, internet and other communication mediums was also a major challenge for the various fields. The new avenues, brought in a bigger audience, bigger sale opportunity but that came at a price of bringing the best and most economical solution fastest. Especially, if we see the recent pandemic, the companies had to evolve in such a short time to help them cater to the ever-changing problems at hand. All of this is only possible, when people have the required imagination and determination to tackle unforeseen problems every day. The knowledge base can help you to a certain level, post that it’s your skill, long sighted vision and imagination that helps you take the crunch spilt-second decisions to save you enormous amount of money.
Finally, before concluding, having the best knowledge of any topic is just the half battle, finding the drive to have vision, imagination, and passion to reach to the best solution will make your solution the best version of itself. Knowledge can help you answer the 4 of the 5 W-H questions, but the answer to “how” will always stay with the person who can imagine.
Even though most of the points stated above, will make you consider that in successful cases imagination holds higher virtue than knowledge, but that should be done only when one is fully aware of the shortcomings of the all or nothing attitude. Imagination can help your ideas reach the next level, but of what use are the ideas, when you lack the building blocks(knowledge) to lay a stable foundation. Ideating without knowledge, will only work till a certain aspect of the solution. More that that, there are some tasks such as farming, postal services, where knowledge of the tasks is far more important than the curiosity to imagine.
In conclusion, I agree with the statement that imagination is a more important than knowledge, in solutions where you have to make non-technical quick decisions, but the general consensus of knowledge being the second fiddle is an unfair remark.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 267, Rule ID: AS_TIME_PROGRESSED[1]
Message: Did you mean 'as time passed'?
Suggestion: As time passed
...e the two markers of human development. As time progressed, the old imaginations became the curren...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 490, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: that
... a certain aspect of the solution. More that that, there are some tasks such as farming, ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 171, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'consensus'.
Suggestion: consensus
... non-technical quick decisions, but the general consensus of knowledge being the second fiddle is...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, however, if, second, so, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 14.8657303371 148% => OK
Relative clauses : 20.0 11.3162921348 177% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 33.0505617978 112% => OK
Preposition: 74.0 58.6224719101 126% => OK
Nominalization: 28.0 12.9106741573 217% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2872.0 2235.4752809 128% => OK
No of words: 566.0 442.535393258 128% => OK
Chars per words: 5.074204947 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.87757670434 4.55969084622 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94963910291 2.79657885939 105% => OK
Unique words: 286.0 215.323595506 133% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.505300353357 0.4932671777 102% => OK
syllable_count: 904.5 704.065955056 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.10617977528 258% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 6.0 1.77640449438 338% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.5022330242 60.3974514979 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.545454545 118.986275619 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.7272727273 23.4991977007 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.77272727273 5.21951772744 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 10.2758426966 165% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.295508260272 0.243740707755 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0836713547007 0.0831039109588 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0785327522838 0.0758088955206 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157160818914 0.150359130593 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0647406317543 0.0667264976115 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 14.1392134831 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 48.8420337079 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 12.1743820225 107% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.1639044944 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.59 8.38706741573 102% => OK
difficult_words: 133.0 100.480337079 132% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.