A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position

Essay topics:

A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.

Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.

A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college can be agreed upon to a certain extent. Educating the younger generation wisely and properly is very important for any country. Today's generation is going to be tomorrow's future, and this calls for the right investment in the early stages. A school or pre-primary class is where any student develops ethics and values that ultimately help him or her shape their future eventually benefiting the country. The lessons that we learn in these classes determine and guide us to our goals and endeavors. However, studying or having a unilateral curriculum, for its students, depending on the context, could sometimes narrow down their scope and ability in the future.

There are many countries that have implemented a national curriculum or study. pattern for its younger generation. In India, for example, students in pre-primary and secondary classes are taught the conventional subjects mainly, Mathematics, Science, English and, Social Science. Mathematics, considered to be one of the most important subjects, useful even in our day-to-day lives, helps students understand the complex postulates and calculations that later occur in their higher classes. Science, on the other hand, enables them to learn and understand various scientific phenomena, from the basic revolution of earth to the complex laws of Newton. The other subjects encourage students with social and historical values that are very essential. Having a curriculum of such subjects would help the country prosper economically and morally, but reduces the student's exposure to other activities like sports that are equally important.

It is important to understand the extent of such curriculum activities. Any activity involving unethical or immoral values should not be influenced. For example, in Nazi Germany during World War II, students in German schools were taught values relating to the superiority of a particular race and ethnicity. These values on the minds of a young and naive generation could have a very adverse effect. The country's leadership shows lack of vision and ethical conduct, encouraging these types of national curriculums is deleterious.

In conclusion, a national curriculum for all of its students in any country should be based on subjects, that would eventually help them lead the nation and, shape their future accordingly. The bureaucrats and policymakers have an obligation to create and produce laws that enable students to gain a curriculum benefiting the country and not vice versa.

Votes
Average: 6.6 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 80, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Pattern
...emented a national curriculum or study. pattern for its younger generation. In India, f...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 860, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...onomically and morally, but reduces the students exposure to other activities like sport...
^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, but, however, if, second, so, for example, in conclusion, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 25.0 14.8657303371 168% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 30.0 33.0505617978 91% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 58.6224719101 78% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2199.0 2235.4752809 98% => OK
No of words: 404.0 442.535393258 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.44306930693 5.05705443957 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48327461151 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88730913037 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 215.323595506 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.534653465347 0.4932671777 108% => OK
syllable_count: 693.9 704.065955056 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.8459976946 60.3974514979 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.95 118.986275619 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2 23.4991977007 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.4 5.21951772744 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.225028084118 0.243740707755 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0713779951442 0.0831039109588 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102600298825 0.0758088955206 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146778901846 0.150359130593 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0616368204815 0.0667264976115 92% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 14.1392134831 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 48.8420337079 87% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.27 12.1639044944 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.28 8.38706741573 111% => OK
difficult_words: 119.0 100.480337079 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.


Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.