a nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college
Our Elders usually instruct us to a king of the deck rather than the jack of all trades however modern competitive reality seems to support the jacks much better than the kings. Enforcing students evrywhere in the nation through similar set of routine may turn out to be quite ineffective for the development of their skills.
When it comes to studying variety is the key when it comes to overall polishing of a student's skills, it is well documented that students who are put through curriculum with diverse applications have a much higher chance of honing their overall IQ. This is due to the challenge it brings to the table as rarely any students can be a jack of a jack of all trades thus forcing the brain to adapt and learn new patterns and methods to further augment their neural network.
Exposure to these diverse fields lead to students developing unique skills and thus promoting different sectors opportunities, as a nation will benefit from advancing all their disparate branches to develop such as business, sciences or art etc. Also if students were to train in a single discipline this will limit their areas of favourable opportunities, for example- A curriculum not focussed on art will surely affect students looking to enter college of photography, sculpting etc.
Furthermore it could lead to frustation in children who have worked hard to get good grades in Chemistry or Physics but failed to get a good understanding of economics if it is not included. A student looking to advnace their career in Archaeology will be very frustated when their understanding of the field they wish to pursue is blinkered. This frustation could turn into depression which is going to affect the generation that is going to lead us into tomorrow and these shoulders should be strong and firm, this practice will only affect them severely.
Even if we were to adapt this practice and made students to learn the same subjects all over, what happens when they interact will other students at international level or apply for jobs in a foreign land? They will be at a clear disadvantage when it comes to being protean , which is demanded when it comes to higher level competitiveness at the international level. Producing the best engineers in the world may seem like a great monetary idea but if they fail to understand basic economics, all the money will run out before they know it.
The idea has a positive motivation behind it and is appreciable as development of the most basic subjects like science is vital, as these are respectable subjects when it comes to logic development and reasoning skills. However a better way would be to make these subjects as a major focus but still have other subjects for the complete development of a perfect student.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Furthermore,
...llege of photography, sculpting etc. Furthermore it could lead to frustation in children...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 274, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...advantage when it comes to being protean , which is demanded when it comes to high...
^^
Line 11, column 221, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...logic development and reasoning skills. However a better way would be to make these sub...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, look, may, so, still, thus, well, for example, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 33.0505617978 118% => OK
Preposition: 66.0 58.6224719101 113% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2302.0 2235.4752809 103% => OK
No of words: 471.0 442.535393258 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88747346072 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.65859790218 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77286724024 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 240.0 215.323595506 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.509554140127 0.4932671777 103% => OK
syllable_count: 712.8 704.065955056 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.38483146067 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.2370786517 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 33.0 23.0359550562 143% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 35.0946242758 60.3974514979 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 164.428571429 118.986275619 138% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.6428571429 23.4991977007 143% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 5.21951772744 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.192399884 0.243740707755 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0620240679884 0.0831039109588 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0450784722196 0.0758088955206 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0889804168675 0.150359130593 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0489835579136 0.0667264976115 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.4 14.1392134831 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.44 48.8420337079 95% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 12.1743820225 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.67 12.1639044944 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.99 8.38706741573 107% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 100.480337079 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 11.8971910112 160% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.2 11.2143820225 136% => OK
text_standard: 19.0 11.7820224719 161% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.