Only through mistakes can there be discovery or progress.
The author claims that it is possible to make discovery or progress only through mistake. In my view, although developments or progresses usually come from persevering in trying and correcting. However, this claim is too extreme that ignores some achievements in our world.
Admittedly, learning from mistake is a route of becoming excellent. After all, practice makes perfect. This statement is valid through out infant to adult. To learn the mother language from null knowledge, babies experience innumerable frustrating attempts to speak, by correcting and modifying details for faulty sentences they speak every time, they can finally communicate with their parent and present accurately their moods and needs. For dancers, they correct and improve their postures and actions throughout practices, through the mistake they discover from the recording video and their coaches, they are able to perform perfectly on the stage.
Further more, trial and error is also the nature of the world, no matter in the biosphere or in the realm of science. In the history, scientists usually weather frustrations and mistakes, then by learning and correcting in each trial, they achieve their success. The invention of light bulb is a good example. Edison, who is the inventor of the light bulb, in his decades of research, he had tried a wide range of different material for the filaments to achieve durable and bright light bulb. In this process, he experience many of failure and finally found the element, tungsten, for the light bulb and therefore achieve such great contribution in human society. On the other hand, process of evolution just like the experiment of god: it discards the gene and descendants that is not suitable for the environment resulting in stable and durable biosphere.
However, there are a lot of things that don’t come from mistakes. To illustrate, the architecture is the brainchild of humans that has little tolerance of mistake. In this case, engineers need to make a deliberate plan and blue print for constructing a building, there is no room for trial and error. If the construction of a house or a bridge is not ensured without fault, then it not only will cause a huge amount of cost which brings from the reconstruction, but also resulting in great danger for the user. Therefore, for these areas that demand high precision, the rule of learning from mistake is not appropriate.
To sum up, it is undeniably that we can see many progresses or achievements came from mistakes, from the area of nature to human society. Nevertheless, we can not generalize this phenomena to every situation. Some works are based on meticulous and rigorous plan to achieve, which mistakes are not their necessity.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 128, Rule ID: THROUGH_OUT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'throughout'?
Suggestion: throughout
... makes perfect. This statement is valid through out infant to adult. To learn the mother la...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 514, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'experiences'.
Suggestion: experiences
... bright light bulb. In this process, he experience many of failure and finally found the e...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 627, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he light bulb and therefore achieve such great contribution in human society. On ...
^^
Line 9, column 175, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...ty. Nevertheless, we can not generalize this phenomena to every situation. Some work...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, however, if, nevertheless, so, then, therefore, after all, in my view, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 12.4196629213 40% => OK
Conjunction : 24.0 14.8657303371 161% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 33.0505617978 109% => OK
Preposition: 66.0 58.6224719101 113% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2292.0 2235.4752809 103% => OK
No of words: 446.0 442.535393258 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13901345291 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.5955099915 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82178250656 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 246.0 215.323595506 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.551569506726 0.4932671777 112% => OK
syllable_count: 701.1 704.065955056 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 13.0 4.38483146067 296% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.2852177255 60.3974514979 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.181818182 118.986275619 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2727272727 23.4991977007 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.40909090909 5.21951772744 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 5.13820224719 195% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.153987422605 0.243740707755 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0452138661452 0.0831039109588 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0729805087487 0.0758088955206 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0967212295083 0.150359130593 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0711757189129 0.0667264976115 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 14.1392134831 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 48.8420337079 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 12.1639044944 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.66 8.38706741573 103% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 100.480337079 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.8971910112 59% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.83 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.