In order to improve the quality of instruction at the college and university level, all faculty should be required to spend time working outside the academic world in professions relevant to the courses they teach.
In order to better quality instruction and give practical knowledge to the students, I personally agree with the statement that in order to quality instruction of the job market professors should work outside the academics and in professions relevant to the subjects.
In the academic world teachers and instructors are the most influential professionals and they shape the pedagogy process and the quality of teaching. In university or college level, unlike the school level, students preparing for professional job markets and to get insight viewed of the job market teachers should give them practical or professional knowledge. For example, as civil engineer students, it would be helpful to us if the professor gives us the field example or field practical like surveying instruments or construction works, rather than just pompous speech. In order to give the instructions, a professor must practice that professional knowledge and thus should be in some practical professional works.
In the professional market new problems, practical solution and pragmatic innovations are perennial, and if a teacher doing work at a profession he might come across the new innovations those are not in the books. He came across practical problems relevant to the subjects. For example, if a professor works at Google for a certain period he might better explain the programming dilemma and cyber threats in the real world to his computer engineering students.
people may argue that this type of theory might burdensome to the teachers, besides the teacher's job is to instruct the students in theoretical knowledge, not in the professional field. Students who interested in field work should join a company as an intern to developed practical knowledge. It might be true but a professional knowledge of a subject is helpful for better understanding and for a pellucid explanation.
AT the epilogue of the topic I would say that teacher work outside the academic world might help them, they might come across the new inventions in professional work and different view on subjects. Besides practical knowledge help both teacher and students to cogently understand a subject.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 152, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...gy process and the quality of teaching. In university or college level, unlike the...
^^
Line 5, column 462, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d to his computer engineering students. people may argue that this type of theor...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: People
...his computer engineering students. people may argue that this type of theory migh...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, if, may, so, thus, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 19.5258426966 41% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 14.8657303371 121% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 33.0505617978 61% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 58.6224719101 78% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1837.0 2235.4752809 82% => OK
No of words: 343.0 442.535393258 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.3556851312 5.05705443957 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30351707066 4.55969084622 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0565450838 2.79657885939 109% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 215.323595506 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.472303206997 0.4932671777 96% => OK
syllable_count: 547.2 704.065955056 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.2370786517 64% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 23.0359550562 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.2198768783 60.3974514979 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.307692308 118.986275619 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.3846153846 23.4991977007 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.38461538462 5.21951772744 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.211923068236 0.243740707755 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0817492031581 0.0831039109588 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0746221276901 0.0758088955206 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140409663485 0.150359130593 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0803482855498 0.0667264976115 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 14.1392134831 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 48.8420337079 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.1743820225 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 12.1639044944 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.33 8.38706741573 99% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 100.480337079 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.8971910112 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.2143820225 111% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.