Originality does not mean thinking something that was never thought before; it means putting old ideas together in new ways.
The significance of generating a new idea or a new creature, especially, in our today’s convoluted globe is not stealthy for anyone. Among a diversified constellation of perspectives, some may regard the originality as the things which does not subsistence previously, in contrast, others may persevere in unraveling the notion that originality should be defined as the combination of the conventional methods into the new way. According to weighing the two angles of these ideas, the former one can be vigorously justified. Since, there should be considered the difference between innovation and originality, in depth, originality talks about the belief or creature which does not exist any time.
Consider first the respect people hold for originality as the new thing which does not possess any progenitors. Going into the depth, the exact definition of originality is the precursor of one thing which other same types of that have a chance to grow and evolve. Thus, evolution can take occurred based on the prime source of one case. To elucidate on, having unearthed or created the one with none fingerprint in the history, the human can allege that he has access to an original item. Thus, there is a common tenet that evolution can be pursued thanks to the original case of one thing which opens up new avenues for subsequent persons to ameliorate or alter it.
In approaching the former group, originality as the exact and strong source to allude the other things emanating from it can be scrutinized aptly. To put in general words, only when the sustenance of one thing can be discovered in one way as a specific one, can it be called an original material. As a matter of the fact, nor does it seem logical that there are a plethora of several items which each of them may subsume various features provoking contrasts in individuals’ opinions. Because there should be one valid and verified resource to provide accurate and coherent information about special subject propelling humans toward the proper and pellucid way. As a result, who can underestimate the necessity of one exact source or an original one to refer it when the scholars deal with obstacles and hardships?
To converge on the latter belief, combination of what is existed or belonged to the past in new direction and position cannot totally demystify the meaning of originality. Simply stated, seldom does the new thing own the characteristics exactly deviating from its ancestors. Thus, there is always the high probability of making the thing not new, but just it seems different through some angles. Additionally, based on one scientific investigation in psychology province, the closer two items for incorporations, the less the possibility of creating novel item will be observed.
Drawing upon the enumerated reasons, the benefits of expressing the originality as the things with no any pioneers are too enormous to fathom. To recapitulate, not only can it be deemed as a proof reference for following creatures, but also this definition may predispose the humans to novel items.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 100, Rule ID: NOW[2]
Message: Did you mean 'now' (=at this moment) instead of 'no' (negation)?
Suggestion: now
...sing the originality as the things with no any pioneers are too enormous to fathom...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, so, thus, in contrast, in general, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 12.4196629213 145% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 33.0505617978 54% => OK
Preposition: 65.0 58.6224719101 111% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 12.9106741573 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2581.0 2235.4752809 115% => OK
No of words: 505.0 442.535393258 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11089108911 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.74048574033 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95012689576 2.79657885939 105% => OK
Unique words: 268.0 215.323595506 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.530693069307 0.4932671777 108% => OK
syllable_count: 853.2 704.065955056 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 6.24550561798 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.38483146067 228% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.5335828336 60.3974514979 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.05 118.986275619 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.25 23.4991977007 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.65 5.21951772744 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.122430090312 0.243740707755 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0413943422782 0.0831039109588 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.034488456618 0.0758088955206 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0728142697051 0.150359130593 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0347714257483 0.0667264976115 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 14.1392134831 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 48.8420337079 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 12.1743820225 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.1639044944 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.66 8.38706741573 115% => OK
difficult_words: 153.0 100.480337079 152% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.0 11.8971910112 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.