As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems,
the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.
Technology has evolved massively over the last 100 years, it has not only revolutionized our lives but also made it easier for humans to build, work and evolve as a species. It has become a major part of our human lives, these days one can't live without a mobile phone nor can a student live without his or her laptop. As it has become such an integral part of our lives, the question surely arises whether it has affected our ability as humans to think.
Mobile phones were the greatest technological gift to mankind as we now can use them as an infinite device to do any work. For example, in the olden days even a mere phone call used to take time as very few telephones were available and everyone wanted to use them and people used to charge exorbitant rates for a call. As the years passed, now we can communicate with people in different countries in a split second. The power of mobile computing has become so advanced that our cellphone takes as good pictures as a professional camera at a fraction of the price.
Schools and colleges have made it necessary for most of the students to use a laptop, it has become a revolutionary tool with which people have made fortunes and destroyed some. Taking an example of Mark Zuckerberg who coded Facebook in his dorm room is now worth over a $100 billion dollars while hackers can easily misuse this computing technology to hack into bank accounts and other personal information of anyone on the internet.
As the 21st century progressed, new technologies like artificial intelligence and machine learning have really changed the way we live. Automobiles are now self driven using this technology and other economic jobs which used to employ thousands of people have now been replaced because of this futuristic technology. Technology does make us lazy but that is because it also makes our lives easier. We can focus on the bigger things in life and let technology handle the mere things.
Technology has had an adverse effect on our lives too. Children exposed to mobile phones at a young age don't learn how to communicate and build relationships with each other because they are busy playing games on this piece of tech. Some people lack communication and people's skills because they have never really had a deep conversation with someone to build on. Relationships which are ignited because of dating apps lack morals and values of a real relationship.
This new world of technology we live in does have its own pros and cons but to conclude I would like to say that yes, technology is one of the greatest gift to mankind. From the discovery of fire to self driving automobiles it will keep evolving to unimaginable levels but sometimes it could be a problem to tackle.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 237, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...part of our human lives, these days one cant live without a mobile phone nor can a s...
^^^^
Line 7, column 100, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to have'
Suggestion: to have
...icial intelligence and machine learning have really changed the way we live. Automob...
^^^^
Line 10, column 105, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...exposed to mobile phones at a young age dont learn how to communicate and build rela...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, really, second, so, while, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 19.5258426966 51% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 14.8657303371 128% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 41.0 33.0505617978 124% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 59.0 58.6224719101 101% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2265.0 2235.4752809 101% => OK
No of words: 478.0 442.535393258 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.73849372385 5.05705443957 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.67581127817 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64438870399 2.79657885939 95% => OK
Unique words: 262.0 215.323595506 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.548117154812 0.4932671777 111% => OK
syllable_count: 747.9 704.065955056 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.0753327507 60.3974514979 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.210526316 118.986275619 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.1578947368 23.4991977007 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.78947368421 5.21951772744 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.138681224349 0.243740707755 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0431714337762 0.0831039109588 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0304465772685 0.0758088955206 40% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0712778191156 0.150359130593 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0247021103312 0.0667264976115 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 14.1392134831 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 48.8420337079 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 12.1743820225 107% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.51 12.1639044944 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.48 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 100.480337079 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.