As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.
Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
History is technological development has always brought the dirastic changes in the society either for netter or worse. The prompt suggests that the reliance on the technology to solve problem will dwindle the humans ability. I mostly disagree with the given statement for the following reasons.
FIrstly, since, the development of the technology, the vast majority of the human population has exceled in all the fields be it science or accounts or any. For an instance, previously if people wanted to communicate then they used send their message via birds, which had many problems as sometimes the bird would lose its track and message would not be delivered. However, the technology changed and people adapted with it and grew with it. Later, people started excahnding messages via post office. And ,now, we have been blessed with the telepones, mobiles and the social netveoring sites thet has made the world a global village.
Secondly, it is us, human, who devoloped the technology, it is us who upgrade it and it is us who have made technology impecable part of our lives. Technology was not bulit in a day several beautiful, aept and sintellating mind had and has been contrubiting to its development. Previously, we would not know what the weather will be tomorrow, but naw due to the developmant of agrometerological instruments we are able tp precise;y predict of what the weather will be in any day of a year. Previously, when people got bit by a rabised dog are has tuberciuosis they died; however, now it is technology that has given man kind allopathic teratment and medicines to cure disease.
Lastly, some might argue that, being dependent on somethning always curtails the ability and the skills that one poses. Like, people ,today, are so consumed in electronic devices that they barely have time to take care of themselves or people around them. Most people are suffering from anxity and depression. Migrane, moisture loss in eues are minor effects where as blindness and paralysis are final and acute effects of getting to consumed on television, mobile, internet.
In conclusion, the development of technology was never ment to produce harm to any one but to help present and fur=ture generation solve problems. It is on us that how we use the technology, so we betterbe wise in usint it rather than putting blame on it.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 211, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'humans'' or 'human's'?
Suggestion: humans'; human's
...ology to solve problem will dwindle the humans ability. I mostly disagree with the giv...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 505, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...excahnding messages via post office. And ,now, we have been blessed with the telep...
^^
Line 7, column 133, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... the skills that one poses. Like, people ,today, are so consumed in electronic dev...
^^
Line 7, column 360, Rule ID: WHERE_AS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'whereas'?
Suggestion: whereas
...moisture loss in eues are minor effects where as blindness and paralysis are final and a...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 80, Rule ID: ANY_BODY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'anyone'?
Suggestion: anyone
...ology was never ment to produce harm to any one but to help present and fur=ture genera...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, lastly, second, secondly, so, then, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 14.8657303371 128% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 33.0505617978 109% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 58.6224719101 67% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1962.0 2235.4752809 88% => OK
No of words: 393.0 442.535393258 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.99236641221 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45244063426 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82125764863 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 230.0 215.323595506 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.58524173028 0.4932671777 119% => OK
syllable_count: 628.2 704.065955056 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.4501830118 60.3974514979 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.0 118.986275619 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8333333333 23.4991977007 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.61111111111 5.21951772744 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 10.2758426966 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.179409833928 0.243740707755 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0558678790776 0.0831039109588 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.05060669959 0.0758088955206 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100873864514 0.150359130593 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0712157452505 0.0667264976115 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 14.1392134831 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 48.8420337079 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 12.1639044944 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.9 8.38706741573 106% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 100.480337079 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.