As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate
As the instruction depicted above, people will rely more and more on technology to solve problem with their ability of thinking for themselves deteriorating. Admittedly it is reasonable based on the following aspects.
First, this phenomenon can be attributed to the time. In the short period from now, we consign pretty many of the problems in our lives to the products of technology, such as smartphones for communication, entertainment etc. Meanwhile, the emerge of AI, metaverse let us assign more problem to them. For example, by using general online payment ,we don’t need to bring different kinds of bank cards or credit cards for different kinds of payment. There is no doubt that we give up the real world and embrace the cyber one with fewer things to be considered and solved. As this inevitable trend begins ,with the rapid development of the technology, in the long run ,we may find it easier to solve problems by technology even in some complicated problems that people’s emotion should be taken into main consideration like community works. it’s reasonable to say that our ability to think our themselves will surely deteriorate.
Second, this phenomenon can have great influences on hierarchy. For those who are not learned, with the development of technology ,their work may be superseded by technology in the not distance future, but they are used to the benefit it brought and become too lazy to think over the problems emerged in their lives, in themselves. For the elites, although they can avoid such problems of being idle and lose their ability of thought, for example they only keep an eye on some key process and leave something relatively with low priority to the technology. However, using more and more technology to solve problems may let them unwitting to the detail of the problems when we human being think about ourselves . Like some music conductors, they may rely on the technology too much to develop a smart sense of art. In one word , the aspect of hierarchy can have a influence on the deterioration.
Whether the technology that can solve problems for human directly leads to the degrade of our ability of thinking for ourselves has been unknown. There are another two assumption to make the instruction more indisputable. The first one is that the technology advancement is beyond our controls and it intervenes our normal lives, making we human beings domination more fickle, leading to a less able to think for ourselves, causing the deterioration. If the development is within our control ,we can prevent it happening.
The second one is that we give up thinking for ourselves from the bottom of our hearts, if we abandon or even reject thinking for ourselves , the ability of which is doomed to be deteriorate.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 236, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...nication, entertainment etc. Meanwhile, the emerge of AI, metaverse let us assign more pro...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 344, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...example, by using general online payment ,we don’t need to bring different kinds o...
^^
Line 3, column 600, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... solved. As this inevitable trend begins ,with the rapid development of the techno...
^^
Line 3, column 663, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...pment of the technology, in the long run ,we may find it easier to solve problems ...
^^
Line 3, column 837, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...ain consideration like community works. it’s reasonable to say that our ability to...
^^
Line 4, column 129, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...rned, with the development of technology ,their work may be superseded by technol...
^^
Line 4, column 159, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...technology ,their work may be superseded by technology in the not distance future...
^^
Line 4, column 710, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...hen we human being think about ourselves . Like some music conductors, they may re...
^^
Line 4, column 826, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...evelop a smart sense of art. In one word , the aspect of hierarchy can have a infl...
^^
Line 4, column 862, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...word , the aspect of hierarchy can have a influence on the deterioration. Whethe...
^
Line 5, column 76, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...ve problems for human directly leads to the degrade of our ability of thinking for ourselve...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 168, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'assumptions'?
Suggestion: assumptions
...has been unknown. There are another two assumption to make the instruction more indisputab...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 346, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'beings'' or 'being's'?
Suggestion: beings'; being's
...venes our normal lives, making we human beings domination more fickle, leading to a le...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 491, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...If the development is within our control ,we can prevent it happening. The second...
^^
Line 6, column 140, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...on or even reject thinking for ourselves , the ability of which is doomed to be de...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, may, second, so, while, for example, no doubt, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 52.0 33.0505617978 157% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 71.0 58.6224719101 121% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 12.9106741573 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2304.0 2235.4752809 103% => OK
No of words: 462.0 442.535393258 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98701298701 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.63618218583 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84545792877 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 234.0 215.323595506 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.506493506494 0.4932671777 103% => OK
syllable_count: 728.1 704.065955056 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 68.2795723478 60.3974514979 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.2 118.986275619 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1 23.4991977007 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.95 5.21951772744 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 15.0 7.80617977528 192% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.409717147503 0.243740707755 168% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.124564870463 0.0831039109588 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.147236172132 0.0758088955206 194% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.275712913141 0.150359130593 183% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.133915787678 0.0667264976115 201% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 14.1392134831 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 48.8420337079 99% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 12.1639044944 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.23 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 100.480337079 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.