The real talent of a popular musician cannot accurately be assessed until the musician has been dead for several generations, so that his or her fame does not interfere with honest assessment
The statement argues that, often we mistake popularity of a person or a celebrity as a sure indication of their talents and so the actual brilliance of a musician should better be assessed years later. There may be some benefits of doing that, however, it's not quite essential to do so to apprehend the aptitude of a musician, and in many cases it may become unfeasible to do as a result of change in people's preferences.
The first reason why we don't need to wait for an artist's death to assess his talent is because, without any talent he would not be popular among his people. While it's true sometimes, flashy pieces of song get attention of people very easily, it's also true that such music has fugacious value and rarely can make a place in the heart of the people. For example, many remixed songs create buzz among the youngsters. But such songs are easily forgotten as soon as another more catchy one is released. So, if an artist is famous throughout his lifetime, we can safely say that he was talented enough to produce versatile and beautiful composition for a long time period.
The second problem with judging the talent of an artist posthumously is that, the bar of standard changes with time. People have different taste in music today than they had few decades earlier. The musicians used lyrics and language patterns that are completely different from what we use now. On top of that, previously the usage of the very same musical instruments was different from today's one. Not only that, they used different instruments which may be no longer extant. As a result most of the old music seem unrelatable to us and we won't be in the position to appraise its exact talent anymore.
While taste and preferences change from generation to generation, true talent is timeless. A masterpiece of Beethoven still creates the same appeal it did when it was first composed. Marilyn Monroe is still considered as the epitome of beauty and elegance. We barely listen to Symphonies and such music, but that makes these compositions less popular, not less talented. So one may argue that, posthumous assessment of an artist's talent is not unattainable. But the question remains, is that truly necessary?
As the above mentioned facts, it can be said that the real talent of any artist can be studied anytime given the critics are dispassionate in their judgments.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 254, Rule ID: IT_IS[6]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
...e some benefits of doing that, however, its not quite essential to do so to apprehe...
^^^
Line 3, column 25, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...references. The first reason why we dont need to wait for an artists death to as...
^^^^
Line 3, column 50, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'artists'' or 'artist's'?
Suggestion: artists'; artist's
... reason why we dont need to wait for an artists death to assess his talent is because, ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 392, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... example, many remixed songs create buzz among the youngsters. But such songs are...
^^
Line 6, column 424, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'artists'' or 'artist's'?
Suggestion: artists'; artist's
...argue that, posthumous assessment of an artists talent is not unattainable. But the qu...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, second, so, still, while, for example, as a result, in many cases, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 33.0505617978 112% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 58.6224719101 75% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1966.0 2235.4752809 88% => OK
No of words: 409.0 442.535393258 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.80684596577 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49708221141 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64429694981 2.79657885939 95% => OK
Unique words: 233.0 215.323595506 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.569682151589 0.4932671777 115% => OK
syllable_count: 635.4 704.065955056 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.388711736 60.3974514979 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.3 118.986275619 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.45 23.4991977007 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.85 5.21951772744 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 10.2758426966 156% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.199018538223 0.243740707755 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0533791162324 0.0831039109588 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0596576872917 0.0758088955206 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109851450544 0.150359130593 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0374790543593 0.0667264976115 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 14.1392134831 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 48.8420337079 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 12.1639044944 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.38706741573 103% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 100.480337079 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.5 11.8971910112 155% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.