People are so busy with their lives, so they tend to ignore any problem until it hit them in their faces. Scandals can act as a wake-up call for profound change and raise people attention on a specific problem more than speakers or reformers can ever do. At the same time, scandals have many negative impacts as well.
Scandals are most common in politics, where most of the people tend to scrutinize the politician's actions, especially in elections time. Mostly, the politicians use scandals as a tool to discredit their opponents. We all remember the scandal of the former president Bill Clinton. The other political party used this scandal to damage Clinton's reputation. Furthermore, years later, when Hillary Clinton ran for the presidential election recently, her opponent used the same scandal against her along with other scandals. Scandals in politics are powerful, people could choose who to elect according to these kinds of information.
While media should help to raise people awareness and focus their attention on problems, all types of media instinctively hunt for the scandals to make stunning headlines and raise their popularity. Most of the time scandals are pompous and fallacious and can destroy innocent people lives. Especially with the pervasive use of social media as a source for news. Anyone can create a fake news and create a scandal to ruin the reputation of individual or institution.
Scandals can raise people awareness regarding the consequences of the wrong-doing. most importantly, if scandals involve people whom they consider a role model. In addition to damaging the reputation of the wrong-doer, also it affects other sides of his life such as; health, family and social life. For instance, Maradona, who is considered for many people as the greatest soccer player of all the time, was addicted to drugs (cocaine), this shocking news for his fans around the world soon affected his career, years later he was unable to play soccer anymore as a result. undoubtedly, this kind of scandal touched the lives of many of his fans and raised their awareness about the deteriorating effects of drugs.
In conclusion, Scandals can focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could. However, some scandals affect the lives of people but others are fallacious and aim to ruin the reputation of individuals or institution.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tation of individual or institution. Scandals can raise people awareness rega...
^^
Line 7, column 86, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Most
...ng the consequences of the wrong-doing. most importantly, if scandals involve people...
^^^^
Line 7, column 424, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'drug'.
Suggestion: drug
...player of all the time, was addicted to drugs cocaine, this shocking news for his fan...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 576, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Undoubtedly
...ble to play soccer anymore as a result. undoubtedly, this kind of scandal touched the lives...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, regarding, so, well, while, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, kind of, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 19.5258426966 41% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 33.0505617978 76% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 58.6224719101 84% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2003.0 2235.4752809 90% => OK
No of words: 389.0 442.535393258 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14910025707 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44106776838 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7378555817 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 215.323595506 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.542416452442 0.4932671777 110% => OK
syllable_count: 623.7 704.065955056 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 50.4352059577 60.3974514979 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.15 118.986275619 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.45 23.4991977007 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.8 5.21951772744 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 10.2758426966 19% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 17.0 5.13820224719 331% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.15019861027 0.243740707755 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0582643661302 0.0831039109588 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0766816635226 0.0758088955206 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112746737523 0.150359130593 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0723220241272 0.0667264976115 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 14.1392134831 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.8420337079 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.59 12.1639044944 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.84 8.38706741573 105% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 100.480337079 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.