Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could.
Scandals are a way to emphasize the advent of an unexpected happening. This way, they can be very effective on attracting our attention to problems which otherwise we would struggle to realize. However, depending on the way they are presented, some concerns may come up regardin their trustness.
One of the main characteristics of a scandal is that it usually is an explosive news in its essence. That is, a scandal is the occurrence and exposure of an event until then unlikely to happen. When it is related to a famous person, its potention to attract the mass whets. Because of that, sometimes the way a scandal come out to the public brings some doubts about its veracity or its real potention of being what it says it is.
Let’s take an example from the politics. Around the period of the elections is not seldom that a legion of scandals come up regarding the candidates. Sometimes the midia finds out something that can compromise the profile of a runner, other times, the opositors do so. The thing is, until what extent those news can be reliable? Even if they prove to be true, we have to be chary of whether they are germane to influenciate the qualities we expect to find in a candidate. Because they are posed to us in a scandalized manner, maybe we are biased to think according to what the exposer wants us to see.
On the other hand, scandals can be paramount due to the fact they can expose facts related to people of great eminence or notoriety. People that sometimes are intoucheable by the traditional news or who are not impacted by the way common speakers broadcast a subject to an audience. In this way, a scandal can be a strong weapon against those powerful induviduals who consider themselves inscrutable. By not being concerned with formalities or arrangements, they can be effectively draw the attention of the public to a problem stated.
Therefore, when a scandal is used as a tool to gain the public’s attention to a important subject, they can be really benefitial. Conversely, when being used as a weapon to demean other individuals, putting in check their skills or character, we must be alert not to be compromised with biased information.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 57, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[5]
Message: The adverb 'usually' is usually put after the verb 'is'.
Suggestion: is usually
...characteristics of a scandal is that it usually is an explosive news in its essence. That ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 68, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'explosive news'.
Suggestion: explosive news
...tics of a scandal is that it usually is an explosive news in its essence. That is, a scandal is t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 307, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this news' or 'those newses'?
Suggestion: this news; those newses
... do so. The thing is, until what extent those news can be reliable? Even if they prove to ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 84, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
... to gain the public's attention to a important subject, they can be really b...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, however, if, may, really, regarding, so, then, therefore, by the way, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 29.0 19.5258426966 149% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 14.8657303371 40% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 33.0505617978 112% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 58.6224719101 101% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1820.0 2235.4752809 81% => OK
No of words: 380.0 442.535393258 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.78947368421 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41515443553 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89769705101 2.79657885939 104% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 215.323595506 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.513157894737 0.4932671777 104% => OK
syllable_count: 582.3 704.065955056 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.10617977528 225% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.155555473 60.3974514979 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 95.7894736842 118.986275619 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 23.4991977007 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.21052631579 5.21951772744 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.212080327915 0.243740707755 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0680131764346 0.0831039109588 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0525483559052 0.0758088955206 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129803250892 0.150359130593 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0529885284915 0.0667264976115 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 14.1392134831 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 48.8420337079 122% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.5 12.1639044944 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.7 8.38706741573 104% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 100.480337079 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.