Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could.
Some believe scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could while other conteds for various reasons. Personally, I believe scandals may be useful in some case but also causes problems in many of the cases because of our mistakes shown in scandals to the society, we live in.
Initially, scandals, in most of the cases is never seen as simple mistake by our friends, neighbours, and co-workers. It is simply taken as a big crime that we do it knowingly or unknowingly. However, mistakes like in sports or in class activities might be useful to us as we know it by ourselves and by others too, while viewing video. By this way, it helps us to work on our problems.
Additionally, scandals in our society seemed to be meant as sexual activities in a recorded form which creates a negative impact in our society. Either it is done knowingly or unknowingly, the persception towards us is always negative and it never helps us in knowing our problem but creates a big problem for us which seemed to have bad impact in front of our society, friends and co-workers. So, according to the type of scandals, it is detrmined that it will help us or not for our problems.
Also, scandals like fight in a public might send us to prison and might ruin our career. It is not always necessary, that whatever shown in video is always right. For example, once my friend was on street and unknowingly attacked by a metallyu retarded person. And, in defense to save himself started fighting which in scandal seemed my friend to be wrong and he was penalized for that activities. So, scandals always donot seem to be good for our problems.
In summation, I beleive that, scandals becomes cause for many problems than to focus our attention on problems so, scandals seems less useful in shutting the problems.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, may, so, while, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 46.0 33.0505617978 139% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 58.6224719101 77% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 12.9106741573 31% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1536.0 2235.4752809 69% => OK
No of words: 327.0 442.535393258 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.69724770642 5.05705443957 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25242769721 4.55969084622 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63837643567 2.79657885939 94% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 215.323595506 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.498470948012 0.4932671777 101% => OK
syllable_count: 474.3 704.065955056 67% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.5780314992 60.3974514979 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.4 118.986275619 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8 23.4991977007 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.13333333333 5.21951772744 60% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 10.2758426966 19% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 5.13820224719 234% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.35040608958 0.243740707755 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.118574171983 0.0831039109588 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.168285539618 0.0758088955206 222% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.220578679786 0.150359130593 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.182435255111 0.0667264976115 273% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 14.1392134831 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 48.8420337079 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.98 12.1639044944 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.67 8.38706741573 91% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 100.480337079 62% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.