Science has no meaning without religion
Everyday, the amenities we enjoy are invented/discovered directly via scientific research and studies. From the electricity we use to browse the internet to the cars that we use to transport from one place to another is a direct consequence of science. The prompt claims that religion gives meaning to science. However, I strongly disagree to the claim for two reasons.
Most conspicuously, science challenges various beliefs of religion and engenders some religious beliefs. To illustrate this, it was widely believed that earth was flat by several religions before 20th century. However, scientific experiments proved contrary to the proclaimed belief that the earth was flat. One such experiments involved in estimating the radius of earth based on the length of visible horizon and hence, proving the earth was not indeed flat. These experiments challenged the widely believed religious claims and provided rationality to the people who follow them. Thus, proving my point of view.
Furthermore, science clarifies the rationality behind the beliefs of religion. For instance, in Hindu religion, it is suggested to visit to temples for peace of mind and clarity of thinking. Science allows one to reason this recommendation - we all know that temples are sacred places of worships and the ambiance in the temples is quiet and beatific. According to therapists and neurologists, there are evidence that one can concentrate better and attain a peace of mind in a quiet place. Consequently, it is evident that science gives meaning to several religious beliefs and thus, proving my point of view.
In conclusion, I reiterate the aforementioned examples that strongly suggest that science has meaning without religion. It is science that gives meaning to religious beliefs and it is evident that religion plays no role in giving meaning to science.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: Every day
Everyday, the amenities we enjoy are invented/di...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 128, Rule ID: USE_TO_VERB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
...ch and studies. From the electricity we use to browse the internet to the cars that...
^^^
Line 1, column 175, Rule ID: USE_TO_VERB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
...browse the internet to the cars that we use to transport from one place to another ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, furthermore, hence, however, if, so, thus, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 12.4196629213 8% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 33.0505617978 85% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 58.6224719101 68% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1571.0 2235.4752809 70% => OK
No of words: 291.0 442.535393258 66% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.39862542955 5.05705443957 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.55969084622 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99278821353 2.79657885939 107% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 215.323595506 70% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.515463917526 0.4932671777 104% => OK
syllable_count: 481.5 704.065955056 68% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.4180486972 60.3974514979 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 92.4117647059 118.986275619 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1176470588 23.4991977007 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.94117647059 5.21951772744 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.309169069784 0.243740707755 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101580755304 0.0831039109588 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.133138335378 0.0758088955206 176% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.219483915306 0.150359130593 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.204681329811 0.0667264976115 307% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 14.1392134831 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 48.8420337079 94% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.74 12.1639044944 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.38706741573 102% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 100.480337079 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.8971910112 59% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.