Society should identify those children who have special talents and provide training for them at an early age to develop their talents.
Children are like the raw diamonds extracted from the coal mines, unpolished and lacking luster at the begining but shine the brightest when refined properly. There is a popular saying, "Children are the future of a nation"; they are indeed the future because they are the ones who grow up to become an imperative asset of their society, their nation and the entire world. The prompt assertion of nurturing the children with special talent is therefore cogent and it will help to build a valuable manpower in the future for the community.
To begin with, children with special talents often grow up unnoticed for their unique gifts which render them unable to harness their utmost potential. In many instances, some gifted children cannot showcase their complete talent; thereby wasting their immense potential which could have been utilized for betterment of the society. We have heard about genius children who have been able to invent security systems for large companies like microsofts. Such children have been recognized at an early age for their talent in computer programming and their parents foster their particular talent with required facilities and knowledge. Therefore, it is of utmost importance to spot the talents of such children and mold them in to what their potential can lead them to be in the future instead of letting those special talents getting hidden and rotten away.
At the same time, children with special talents, when allowed to grow up with bad experience in poor environments could even prove to be a bane rather than a boon for the society. If two children of similar capabilities are grown separately in different environments, one in a condition with lack of proper parenting, comdemnation, and threats will may commit crimes or do something bad for the people when he grows up; the other child on the other hand, who has been nurtured with utmost care, provided with training, education, and facilities to develop his skills would definitely walk the right path as he has been shown. The path in which people walk is determined earlier at an early age and it is essential for talented children to receive the attentioin and grooming they deserve in order to spread their wings in the future; otherwise we are simple cutting their wings and preventing them to fly high in the sky.
Similarly, early childhood is also a stage when you learn from friends through sharing experiences, and competing with each other in many ways. Such interaction of children help them grow up together with similar behavior and abilities. It has been proven that friends are responsible to teach people about a lot of things about life, society, and every human require companionship. Therefore, teaching specially talented children and training them will definitely assit other children indirectly and it will also develop their hidden potentials. Providing training to children with special talents allows other children to benefit from it as well and it is obviously a outcome beneficial for the society.
However, some may argue that training children with special talents is a biasedness against other children in the society and it might create factions in the future. However, the training given to such gifted children could be taught the correct ways of social behavior with other children; they can also be directed to spread their knowledge to other children like mentioned above. In fact, there lies a subtle potential in all children, and they are gifted by nature; it is, therefore, essential to groom and train the children according to their ability and potential so that they could make imperative contributions for the society.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 63, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[2]
Message: Did you mean 'growing'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'allow' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: growing
...dren with special talents, when allowed to grow up with bad experience in poor environm...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 669, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...fit from it as well and it is obviously a outcome beneficial for the society. H...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, similarly, so, therefore, well, in fact, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 19.5258426966 138% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 24.0 14.8657303371 161% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 46.0 33.0505617978 139% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 89.0 58.6224719101 152% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3077.0 2235.4752809 138% => OK
No of words: 601.0 442.535393258 136% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11980033278 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.95129289623 4.55969084622 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64455132945 2.79657885939 95% => OK
Unique words: 288.0 215.323595506 134% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.479201331115 0.4932671777 97% => OK
syllable_count: 945.0 704.065955056 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.77640449438 281% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 31.0 23.0359550562 135% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 75.2576368972 60.3974514979 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 161.947368421 118.986275619 136% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.6315789474 23.4991977007 135% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.36842105263 5.21951772744 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 10.2758426966 165% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.423165013231 0.243740707755 174% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.151078557757 0.0831039109588 182% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0948683422597 0.0758088955206 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.2520911928 0.150359130593 168% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0938202292719 0.0667264976115 141% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.5 14.1392134831 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.01 48.8420337079 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 12.1743820225 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.01 12.1639044944 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.72 8.38706741573 104% => OK
difficult_words: 135.0 100.480337079 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 11.2143820225 128% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.