Society should make efforts to save endangered species only if the potential extinction of those species is the result of human activities.
Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider the possible consequences of implementing the policy and explain how these consequences shape your position.
Every single organism living on earth has a significant purpose to serve. Every organism has evolved into the best possible level to survive in its habitat. Deforestation and many other human activities that disrupt the habitat of these organisms should be condemned because no living organism has the right to eradicate another species from the face of Earth. Humans should put in every effort possible to protect the various species existing. Saying that, I am disagreeing with the policy. Be it the human factor or an external factor, maximum effort needs to be placed to save all endangered organisms.
As mentioned above, every single organism is important. Extinction of any species might disrupt the food chains. That might lead to so many possibilities that humans might not even interpret. Tigers are an endangered species. Imagine tigers being extinct. This means there is a significant decrease in predators for many herbivores like deers. This would lead to an extreme rise in deer population that humans might not be able to control. To avoid this, we should be protecting tigers be it endangered by human reasons or by nature’s reasons.
By implementing the above mentioned policy, societies might be ignoring various less known species that are endangered by focusing on the typical examples. This ignorance leads to a loss of a diverse fauna. To elucidate this issue, we can consider the example of sea lives. A lot of focus is on fish being endangered due to plastic waste a very common issue. But many societies are ignorant to the fact that there is also extreme damage being caused to coral reefs. There is not enough effort from the governments to the protection of coral reefs when compared to the efforts made to save fish species.
It sometimes might be inexorable situations where humans are unable to save these endangered species as the environment changes and only those species who can survive that can exist. Survival of the fittest they say. In such conditions it would be a waste of taxpayer money to save such species and should be avoided.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 461, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...arious species existing. Saying that, I am disagreeing with the policy. Be it the human factor...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 19.5258426966 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 14.8657303371 40% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 33.0505617978 76% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 58.6224719101 82% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1740.0 2235.4752809 78% => OK
No of words: 347.0 442.535393258 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0144092219 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31600926901 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63470878945 2.79657885939 94% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 215.323595506 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.533141210375 0.4932671777 108% => OK
syllable_count: 561.6 704.065955056 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 23.0359550562 65% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.7187387508 60.3974514979 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 75.652173913 118.986275619 64% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.0869565217 23.4991977007 64% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.739130434783 5.21951772744 14% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.180396199183 0.243740707755 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0514652514439 0.0831039109588 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0508123603791 0.0758088955206 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120261792849 0.150359130593 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0299937116889 0.0667264976115 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 14.1392134831 69% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 48.8420337079 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 12.1743820225 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.19 12.1639044944 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.38706741573 99% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 100.480337079 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 11.2143820225 71% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.7820224719 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.