In some companies employees are allowed to express their feelings and opinions about the company by sending electronic messages to everyone in the company In other companies this type of communication is strictly prohibited What restrictions if any do you

Essay topics:

In some companies, employees are allowed to express their feelings and opinions about the company by sending electronic messages to everyone in the company. In other companies, this type of communication is strictly prohibited.
What restrictions, if any, do you think companies should place on employees’ electronic communications? Support your views with reasons and/or examples from your own experience, observations, or reading.

The statement stating that in some companies, employees are allowed to express their feelings and opinions about the company by sending electronic messages to everyone in the company, whereas, in other companies, this type of communication is strictly prohibited. It is true that every individual has a right to express his or her views and opinions. A company should work collectively with all of its workers and employees to demonstrate effective work environment. The employees of any company should have the right to assert their view points and opinions as every individuals collaborative working is what guides any organisation towards success. However, employees at the same time have to exercise their rights ethically and within the organizational boundaries.

Many companies world wide have developed various methods to ensure cummulative and collective working of its employees. These include the organizational meeting s and conferences which encourage the workers to voice their opinions. This enables the companies and organizations to consider all the different opinions and ultimately take a decision benifiting the organization. Every company has various departments with suitable employess that have an expertise in handling specific tasks, but also having a platform where they can communicate their viewpoints on different matters other than their own, could benefit the organization. The collaborative working of every employee is essential in attracting individuals across the globe to join the organization.

Any successful company thrives upon its efficiency to deliver and the together working of all its employees. However, some companies believe employees should not be allowed to voice their opinions. Prohibiting communication within any organization could lead to lack of efficiency and effective working. Every employees contribution is as important as the company's director or chairman. Not allowing the employees to express their viewpoints should be discontinued since collaborative working ensures success and advancement. But the same time the employees also have to ensure proper and ethical work environment while working.

In conclusion, every individual in a company should have the right to express their viewpoints and opinions as cummulative working is necessary for cooperative and efficient working of any organization. Companies which hinder their employees from communicating their opinions could be disastrous.

Votes
Average: 5 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 16, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled as one.
Suggestion: worldwide
...izational boundaries. Many companies world wide have developed various methods to ensur...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 16, Rule ID: WORLD_WIDE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'worldwide'?
Suggestion: worldwide
...izational boundaries. Many companies world wide have developed various methods to ensur...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 489, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...an expertise in handling specific tasks, but also having a platform where they ca...
^^^
Line 5, column 210, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...wed to voice their opinions. Prohibiting communication within any organization co...
^^
Line 5, column 312, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'employees'' or 'employee's'?
Suggestion: employees'; employee's
...efficiency and effective working. Every employees contribution is as important as the com...
^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, whereas, while, in conclusion, it is true

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 19.5258426966 51% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 14.8657303371 128% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 33.0505617978 76% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 58.6224719101 75% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2108.0 2235.4752809 94% => OK
No of words: 360.0 442.535393258 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.85555555556 5.05705443957 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35587717469 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.19835991921 2.79657885939 114% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 215.323595506 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.483333333333 0.4932671777 98% => OK
syllable_count: 667.8 704.065955056 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.59117977528 119% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.9373493446 60.3974514979 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.111111111 118.986275619 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 23.4991977007 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.83333333333 5.21951772744 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.409721387418 0.243740707755 168% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.14380148708 0.0831039109588 173% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.119200335695 0.0758088955206 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.286612487213 0.150359130593 191% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0802403424874 0.0667264976115 120% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 14.1392134831 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 25.8 48.8420337079 53% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 12.1743820225 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.71 12.1639044944 137% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.8 8.38706741573 105% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 100.480337079 95% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.8971910112 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.


Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.