Some people believe that government funding of the arts is necessary to ensure that the arts can flourish and be available to all people. Others believe that government funding of the arts threatens the integrity of the arts.
Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns with your own position and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should address both of the views presented.
Introduction of money is always complicated, but indispensable for the growth of the field. I agree with the people who believe that government funding is crucial for art to flourish and be accessible to all. Following are the reasons and a concession to support this thesis.
Influx of capital always helps a field to burgeon, and it true for art as well. The government funds dedicated towards will allow a specific art form to grow, and moreover save the ones which are on the brink of extinction. For instance, RK Laxman Museum in Pune, showcases the eclectic and profound cartoons, as well the creative messages conveyed by them. As our society is moving towards digitalisation, contemporary artists have penchant towards drawing and sketching over the tablets or personal computers, and the former ways of sketching are fading away. However, this museum representing the history of R.K. Laxman's cartoon will remind the younger generation of the history of this specific art form, and also motivate them to keep the older methods alive. The above example illustrates that funds made available by government can be utilised in aggrandising the inclination towards art, and preserving the old heritage of specific art forms.
Moreover, money invested by government would also be utilised to provide a better platforms to the young aspiring artists, and directly supporting their journey of artistic excellence. For example, National School of Drama in New Delhi has been successful in yielding numerous luminaries in the the field of dramatics and acting. These talented people have contributed in drama across all the platforms, be it theater, movies or national television. If a the funds through government are used in enhancing the facilities in the school, which would in turn help the students in learning and becoming better actors. Consequently, the students will in turn represent the nation across world, and fill the population with proud and alacrity. This example support the assertion that the grants from government directed towards art would be highly appreciated by the field, and would in turn play a paramount role in the growth of the art form.
However, some people in some specific situations believe that introducing money in art can lead to corruption, which in turn would be detrimental for the field of art. I conceded this point, and accept that introducing money can give rise to corruption, and deviate the field from it's specific goals. But, this not specific to art only, and can happen to any field. Precluding the fund transfer based on this would be trepidation, and no developmental. There should some measures introduced to keep a check on the capital, instead of categorically denying it.
Conclusively, it is true that money can lead to some negative effects in the field of art, however, it is utterly true and substantiated with above examples that government funds will help the art culture in the nation to grow.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 59, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'trues'?
Suggestion: trues
...always helps a field to burgeon, and it true for art as well. The government funds d...
^^^^
Line 5, column 292, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
...sful in yielding numerous luminaries in the the field of dramatics and acting. These ta...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 292, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
...sful in yielding numerous luminaries in the the field of dramatics and acting. These ta...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 454, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'a' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: a; the
...ater, movies or national television. If a the funds through government are used in en...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, however, if, moreover, so, well, for example, for instance, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 23.0 14.8657303371 155% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 33.0505617978 82% => OK
Preposition: 67.0 58.6224719101 114% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 12.9106741573 147% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2487.0 2235.4752809 111% => OK
No of words: 483.0 442.535393258 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14906832298 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.68799114503 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8493968874 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 241.0 215.323595506 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.498964803313 0.4932671777 101% => OK
syllable_count: 755.1 704.065955056 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 13.0 1.77640449438 732% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.3531145788 60.3974514979 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.428571429 118.986275619 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 23.4991977007 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.52380952381 5.21951772744 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.371580963772 0.243740707755 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114507410027 0.0831039109588 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.126285889172 0.0758088955206 167% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.232383056831 0.150359130593 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0326208643566 0.0667264976115 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 14.1392134831 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 48.8420337079 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.89 12.1639044944 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.96 8.38706741573 107% => OK
difficult_words: 128.0 100.480337079 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.