Unfortunately, in contemporary society, creating an appealing image has become more important than the reality or truth behind that image.
Appealing images of beauty and esthetically pleasing sounds, sights and smells are timeless and intertwined into the human experience. Examples throughout history are art, architecture, and cosmetics. We can all acknowledge that modern society has accentuated trends with technology and an expanded understanding of what makes something esthetically pleasing. However, the trends of today are rooted in the long march of the human experience throughout time.
Beginning with Art, we can clearly see the importance of the human need to create pleasing sights for all to see. If one was to look at the Egyptian hieroglyics, one would see pictures of men and women of accentuated beauty and ornate pictures of animal gods and goddesses. Over 2,000 years ago humans were striving to depict beauty. Travel forward in time to the renaissance. The human form is depicted in raw form. Naked statues of Alexander and others are formed by artist. These depictions are not of the average man. They are of an idealized man. An ideal the average man strived for. Art strives for pleasing forms to present ot the human need to better than what we are.
The human need to better than we are is translated into our need to present a more appealing or please version of ourselves to others. Cosmetics have been the primary way humans have painted a more appealing version of our self for others to see. If we were to examine Art we we would see men and women covered in products hid their vanity. During Queen Elizabeth’s rule, she painted her face with charcoal and pastels to present a pale, but youthful presentation. Many of the men in France during the same time would wear wigs and paint their face to show a more elegant and youthful appearance. An appearance that was intend to appeal to others.
Arts and individual beauty is not the only area we humans have strived for an appealing image. We do so with inanimate objects such as food and physical structures. The French and Japanese culinary arts emphasis both taste and especially presentation. French culinary arts encourage use of sauces to create contrasting and please colors on the plate. Japanese culinary arts encourage simplicity and relative proportion that are please to the eye from a distance. Architecture from the time of the Catholic church emphasized appealing and ornate chapels to welcome worshipers and praise god’s grace upon them. The rules of architecture esthetic beauty can be seen in today’s corporate headquarters that welcome employees and pay homage to the gods of commerce.
We must soundly disagree that the yearning for an appealing image is a facet of the present. It is instead nested in the human experience. An experience that can be seen throughout time in art, cosmetics and other areas such as culinary arts and architecture. Today is no different than the past.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 274, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: we
...thers to see. If we were to examine Art we we would see men and women covered in prod...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 621, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'intended'.
Suggestion: intended
...hful appearance. An appearance that was intend to appeal to others. Arts and indivi...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 477, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...to the eye from a distance. Architecture from the time of the Catholic church emp...
^^
Line 5, column 284, Rule ID: RATHER_THEN[2]
Message: Did you mean 'different 'from''? 'Different than' is often considered colloquial style.
Suggestion: from
...and architecture. Today is no different than the past.
^^^^
Line 5, column 299, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e. Today is no different than the past.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, look, so, as to, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 19.6327345309 112% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.9520958084 93% => OK
Conjunction : 26.0 11.1786427146 233% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 6.0 13.6137724551 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 28.8173652695 94% => OK
Preposition: 66.0 55.5748502994 119% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 16.3942115768 73% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2386.0 2260.96107784 106% => OK
No of words: 477.0 441.139720559 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00209643606 5.12650576532 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.67336384929 4.56307096286 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76834044185 2.78398813304 99% => OK
Unique words: 238.0 204.123752495 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.498951781971 0.468620217663 106% => OK
syllable_count: 759.6 705.55239521 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 4.96107784431 161% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.76447105788 91% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.70958083832 74% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.67365269461 119% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.22255489022 47% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 31.0 19.7664670659 157% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.8473053892 66% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.7243362792 57.8364921388 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 76.9677419355 119.503703932 64% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.3870967742 23.324526521 66% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.35483870968 5.70786347227 24% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.25449101796 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 8.20758483034 195% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 6.88822355289 44% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 12.0 4.67664670659 257% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.132734688675 0.218282227539 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0354424441332 0.0743258471296 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0438300575183 0.0701772020484 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0844301126913 0.128457276422 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0332694334166 0.0628817314937 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 14.3799401198 68% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 48.3550499002 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 12.197005988 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.42 12.5979740519 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.32208582834 100% => OK
difficult_words: 119.0 98.500998004 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 12.3882235529 69% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 11.1389221557 72% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.9071856287 84% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.