Even the sharpest axe needs an efficient handle to deliver its use. In a similar fashion, a message must also have an efficient protocol to deliver it. In both cases the later and the former are independent, but incomplete without the other. I go by the statement given that method to deliver a message is as important as the message itself but not greater than the significance of the message.
Firstly, until a message is properly delivered to the recipient the message is of no use. To elaborate it, if a message is tampered and if its contents are subjected to errors then the message is no longer authentic. Such a message is commensurate to a message not sent.
Secondly, if a message is not delivered on time the message may loose its significance. To instantiate this point, if the message of the assassination of Duke Ferdinand was reached on time, there would be no point of world war. This would have prevented huge loss to the world. A proper delivery mechanism would have better handled this situation.
Finally, if a message is something to be kept hidden or secrete, the message needs to be encrypted. Such a encryption prevents outside invaders from accessing the message, thereby maintaining its importance. Only with a proper delivery mechanism it is possible.
Collecting all the pieces together, the procedures and protocols adopted to deliver a message is as important as the message itself. It is not more important than the message but equally important. Considering the importance of the message, the delivery time, the contents of the message, an appropriate and efficient delivery mechanism needs to be chosen and implemented.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 70, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "In a similar fashion" with adverb for "similar"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...an efficient handle to deliver its use. In a similar fashion, a message must also have an efficient ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...han the significance of the message. Firstly, until a message is properly del...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... commensurate to a message not sent. Secondly, if a message is not delivered ...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 71, Rule ID: LOOSE_LOSE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'lose' (= miss, waste, suffer the loss etc.)?
Suggestion: lose
...s not delivered on time the message may loose its significance. To instantiate this p...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... have better handled this situation. Finally, if a message is something to be...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 111, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...the message needs to be encrypted. Such a encryption prevents outside invaders fr...
^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r delivery mechanism it is possible. Collecting all the pieces together, the ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 12.4196629213 40% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 11.3162921348 9% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 33.0505617978 45% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 58.6224719101 55% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1390.0 2235.4752809 62% => OK
No of words: 277.0 442.535393258 63% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01805054152 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 4.55969084622 89% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94252396124 2.79657885939 105% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 215.323595506 64% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.494584837545 0.4932671777 100% => OK
syllable_count: 463.5 704.065955056 66% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 16.0 23.0359550562 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.1727879522 60.3974514979 60% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 81.7647058824 118.986275619 69% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.2941176471 23.4991977007 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.17647058824 5.21951772744 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 7.80617977528 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.204922045451 0.243740707755 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0838710166827 0.0831039109588 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0761900355268 0.0758088955206 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129281608244 0.150359130593 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.045464606215 0.0667264976115 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 14.1392134831 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 48.8420337079 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.54 12.1639044944 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.25 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 100.480337079 67% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.2143820225 75% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.