Write a response in which you discuss what questions would need to be answered in order to decide
whether the recommendation is likely to have the predicted result. Be sure to explain how the answers to
these questions would help to evaluate the recommendation.
The following appeared as a letter to the editor from a citizen to Preston County.
"It has been observed over the past three years that the reports of damage and destruction of public
property have steadily increased in Preston County. At the same time, it has been noted that there is
a sudden increase in out-of-state travelers who have moved to Preston County over the past few
years. Many citizens of the county believe that these migrants are responsible for increased
incidences of vandalism. We therefore recommend that the county government should take firm
steps to lessen the number of out-of-state migrants in order to prevent further destruction of public
property and reestablish civic order in Preston County.
damage and destruction of public property often impacts the local comunity negatively, for example, the cost of fixing these damages have to be borned by the taxes payed by the locals. damages to certain public objects, like public telephones may hinder or permanently damage the functionality of that public object, thereby reducing the quality of infrastructure available for the locals. The letter written to the editor of preston county has a multitude of assumptions which need to be resolved before further steps can be taken. ( irrelevant)
before taking any actions on the immigrants for the damage and destruction of public proerty, it is imperative to ascertain the source of such incidences. The letter assumes that only humans are responsible for the increased in the incidences of damage and destruction of public property. However, this assumptions may be wrong as these incidences of destruction of property can be caused by a multitude of other sources like bad weather or wild animals.
Furtheremore, even if we assume that these incidences are due to malacious human activities, the letter does not provide concrete evidence that it is due to the immigrants that the number of of incidences of vandalisms have increased. there may be some local socio-political demands of the locals that may not have been met due to which such incidences abound.
Moreover, the county itself may have increased drastically in size over the past three years. this could mean a larger public infrastructure was constructed by the local authorities to support the ever growing propulation. if the population and size of the county has increased, it would be natural for the incidences of vandalisms to increase in number. we must first discern the number of incidences per resident in the county. if such a number has remained constant, it could mean that immigrants are not the source of the problem. In fact, the problem of vandalism may seem larger only because the county itself has grown and that the increase in the instances of vandalism may be in proportion to the increase in the size of the county.
Lastly, I would say there are a plethora of questions to be answered before any concrete plan of actions can be formed. Likewise, it is evident that without ascertaining the above points, it would be premature to take any actions against the immigrants of the preston county.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Damage
damage and destruction of public property ofte...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 186, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Damages
...orned by the taxes payed by the locals. damages to certain public objects, like public ...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 535, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Irrelevant
...ved before further steps can be taken. irrelevant before taking any actions on the ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 545, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... further steps can be taken. irrelevant before taking any actions on the immigra...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Before
...r steps can be taken. irrelevant before taking any actions on the immigrants fo...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 189, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: of
...s due to the immigrants that the number of of incidences of vandalisms have increased...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 236, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: There
...ncidences of vandalisms have increased. there may be some local socio-political deman...
^^^^^
Line 10, column 95, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...ally in size over the past three years. this could mean a larger public infrastructu...
^^^^
Line 10, column 224, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: If
...o support the ever growing propulation. if the population and size of the county h...
^^
Line 10, column 356, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: We
...es of vandalisms to increase in number. we must first discern the number of incide...
^^
Line 10, column 431, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: If
... incidences per resident in the county. if such a number has remained constant, it...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, lastly, likewise, may, moreover, so, for example, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 12.4196629213 137% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 14.8657303371 47% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 33.0505617978 76% => OK
Preposition: 63.0 58.6224719101 107% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2008.0 2235.4752809 90% => OK
No of words: 394.0 442.535393258 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09644670051 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45527027702 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90435631933 2.79657885939 104% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 215.323595506 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.446700507614 0.4932671777 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 645.3 704.065955056 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.4381903478 60.3974514979 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.5 118.986275619 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.625 23.4991977007 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.8125 5.21951772744 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 11.0 7.80617977528 141% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.167756799092 0.243740707755 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0606076203292 0.0831039109588 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0650464610213 0.0758088955206 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103970116743 0.150359130593 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0584887512396 0.0667264976115 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 14.1392134831 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 48.8420337079 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.1743820225 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 12.1639044944 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.51 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 100.480337079 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.8971910112 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.