The line chart compares four different types of turtles in term of changes in its population figures over a period of years in India.
Overall, it is clear that, this country witnessed a decrease in the number of Olive Turtles between 1980 and 2012, while the figure for Leatherback Turtles showed an increase. The fluctuation trend can be seen when we look at the number for Green Turtles and all species.
As can be seen from the chart, in 1980, the population of Leatherback Turtles was respondible for 400. It experienced an gradual growth with over 30 turtles in 2012 and reached a peak of around 140 in 2011. However, the number off Olive Ridley Turtle plunged rapidly nearly 62 in 2012 and reached the lowest point of approximately 60 in 2018.
In comparison, from 1980 to 2002, all species and green turtles’s figure fluctuate slightly. During the following years, these types of turtles had a recover and saw a slight climb in 2012.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 119, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...was respondible for 400. It experienced an gradual growth with over 30 turtles in ...
^^
Line 8, column 149, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...owing years, these types of turtles had a recover and saw a slight climb in 2012.
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, look, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 791.0 965.302439024 82% => OK
No of words: 164.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.82317073171 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57858190836 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58717004466 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.621951219512 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 219.6 283.868780488 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.967283419 43.030603864 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.875 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.5 5.23603664747 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.250148480922 0.215688989381 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109903581824 0.103423049105 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0579254688769 0.0843802449381 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159104096351 0.15604864568 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0296088516287 0.0819641961636 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.2329268293 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 61.2550243902 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.0 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.