The given pie charts compare online sales in the retail sector for six products in Australia for a period of two years 2010 and 2015.
In the overall trend, it can be seen that electric and appliances remained the most popular selling product for both the years with a good jump in the following year followed next by home furnishings and food beverages, while books observed the lowest selling pattern at the online platform.
Getting back to details, almost a 5% increase can be witnessed in the online sale of electronic appliances in 2015 as compared to just 27% in 2010. Food and beverage at the next position attained 22% on proportion rate by a jump of 1% in 2015. Sale of gift items and books rose slightly by 4% and 3% respectively in 2015 as against 7% and 4% in 2010.
On the contrary, the online sale of home furnishings fell down by almost 3% in 2015 accounted for just 19%. However, the sale of video games made up to just 8% in 2015, which was exactly half of its proportion in 2010.
- The chart below shows the amount of money per person per week spent on fast foods mainly on three income groups in Britain The graph shows the trends in the consumption of fast foods from 1970 to 1990 Write a report for a university lecturer describing th 84
- Some feel that it is a waste of time to plan for the future and it is more important to focus on the present To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- The plans below show the layout of a university s sports center now and how it will look after redevelopment Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The charts below show the main reasons for the study among students of different age groups and the amount of support they received from employers 89
- The maps show the change in Pentland from 1980 to 2007 72
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, while, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 824.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 184.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.47826086957 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68302321012 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45459716837 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.576086956522 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 236.7 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.3103789408 43.030603864 147% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.714285714 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.2857142857 22.9334400587 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.359608945673 0.215688989381 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.176935196377 0.103423049105 171% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.153508534383 0.0843802449381 182% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.244421537881 0.15604864568 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.177585997923 0.0819641961636 217% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 70.47 61.2550243902 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.0 11.4140731707 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.5 11.4329268293 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.