The bar chart below gives information about the percentage of the population living in urban areas in different parts of the world.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given graph illustrates the portion of citizens living in cities in six parts of the world in 1950, 2007 and a forecast for 2050.
Overall, it is clearly seen that the percentage of people residing in urban areas increased in every part of the Earth and will continue rising in the future. In addition, Europe, North America and Oceania always had more than half of its citizens living in cities, while the urban population of Africa and Asia was considerably less.
The figures for Europe, North America and Oceania stood at 51, 64 and 62 per cent in 1950, respectively. Then there were a rocketing to 72 per cent in Europe, a 15 per cent rise in North America and a moderate growth to 71 per cent in Oceania. According to forecasts, the urban population in these areas will increase slightly on 5-12 per cent. The figures of Latin America and the Caribbean have similar patterns. It began with just over two-fifth in 1950, rose to 76 per cent in 2007 and expected to reach 89 per cent in 2050.
In contrast, Africa and Asia had only around 16 per cent of people living in urban areas in the first reported year. Then, the data for these parts of the world experienced a gradual increase to 37 and 41 per cent, respectively. Forcast shows that the fraction of individuals in cities in 2050 will be 62 per cent in Africa and almost two thirds in Asia.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, then, third, while, in addition, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1118.0 965.302439024 116% => OK
No of words: 247.0 196.424390244 126% => OK
Chars per words: 4.52631578947 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96437052324 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43592173475 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 106.607317073 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.51012145749 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 339.3 283.868780488 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.5450044968 43.030603864 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.636363636 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4545454545 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0961529463762 0.215688989381 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0474956337644 0.103423049105 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0458865841118 0.0843802449381 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0782890875707 0.15604864568 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0357468500275 0.0819641961636 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.2329268293 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.29 11.4140731707 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.67 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.