The bar chart below shows the percentage of government spending on roads and transport in 4 countries in the years 1990, 1995, 2000 and 2005
The chart illustrates how much money the government spends on road and transport in the Italy, Portugal, UK and USA during the period of 15 years.
Overall, It is viewed that, government had spent the percentage on road and transport of Portugal in the recorded years whilst UK had lower proportion than other countries over a period of 15 years.
To begin, the government expenditure on the road and transport of Portugal was about 27% in 1990 which was consistently decreased and stood st approximately 20% in 2005. By contrast, USA had followed the opposite pattern of Portugal. USA government spent exactly 12% in 1990 and the number went up and reached to a peak of 15% in 2005 with a brief drip in 1995.
On the other hand, in Italy, the government spent more than 20% in 1990, this figure then fluctuated and eventually drooped to exactly 29% in 2005. Similarly, UK government followed the same pattern. The government expenditure on road and transportation was only 10% in 1990 and declined to 9% in 1995. Subsequently, the number marked at 7% in 2005 after reaching to a peak of 13% in 2000.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-02-02 | Jobitha joseph | 78 | view |
| 2022-05-19 | nhiunbtran2011 | view |
- The following bar chart shows the different modes of transport used to travel to and from work in one European city in 1960 1980 and 2000 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at l 74
- Some people think that the media newspapers have the right to publish details of people s private life while other s think it should be controlled Discuss both views 43
- Some people think that government should invest in arts and cultural events. Others think that government should invest money on more important things. 78
- The gap between the rich and the poor people is increasingly widespread, as rich people become richer and poor people grow poorer. What problems could this situation cause? What are the solutions to address the problem. 56
- Do you think that technological advancement has brought more harm than good Use specific reasons and details to support your opinion It is undeniable fact that technologies have been developing day by day and it has changed the society and lifestyles of p 86
Transition Words or Phrases used:
similarly, then, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 917.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 193.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.75129533679 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72725689877 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83880142396 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.523316062176 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 256.5 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.4518866977 43.030603864 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.888888889 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4444444444 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.77777777778 5.23603664747 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.347096482141 0.215688989381 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.132195828716 0.103423049105 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0739833052421 0.0843802449381 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.203148386822 0.15604864568 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0263223028287 0.0819641961636 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.54 61.2550243902 123% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.27 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.62 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.