The bar chart below shows the percentage of students who passed their high school competency exams, by subject and gender, during the period 2010-2011.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar chart shows information about the proportion of high school students in France, Germany and Spain who passed the competency examinations in the school year of 2010-2011. The data is depicted by genders and seven major subjects.
Overall, it is clear that while the portion of girls passing science subjects was higher than that of boys, the reverse trend can be seen in Geography. In addition, Geography was passed by the lowest proportion of girls, whereas the lowest figure for boys was in Chemistry.
In the year 2010-2011, 30,2% of girls passed the subject of Chemistry in the competency exams, which almost doubled the percentage of boys. While there were 56,3% of female students passing Computer Science, the figure for boys was lower by 14,2%.
On the contrary, regarding Geography, 30,4% of boys passed this subject, which was over 10% higher than the figure for girls. Meanwhile, there was not much differences between the proportion of male and female students who passed Physics, History, Foreign Language and Mathematics, although the figures for girls were marginally higher.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 151, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
...ure for girls. Meanwhile, there was not much differences between the proportion of m...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, regarding, whereas, while, in addition, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 926.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 177.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.23163841808 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64748333727 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58946961132 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.576271186441 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 261.0 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.0390447733 43.030603864 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.75 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.125 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.375 5.23603664747 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.20897838437 0.215688989381 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100362785158 0.103423049105 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.106514946679 0.0843802449381 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151661566765 0.15604864568 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.112339668311 0.0819641961636 137% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.2329268293 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 11.4140731707 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.83 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.