the bar chart estimated maximum population of asian elephants.
The bar chart illustrates the quantity of Asian elephants in 9 countries over the period from 1997 to 2004.
Overall, there was a decrease in the number of Asian elephants in almost all countries on the given list except for cambodia. Also, the largest number of elephants was belonged to India.
As can be seen from the chart, in 1997, India had the largest number of elephants with 1000 elephants. myanmar was the country which had the second largest number with 5500 elephants. On the third of this list was Thailand with about 4000 elephants. This was followed by Vietnam, Cambodia, Laos and China with 1000 elephants while malaysia and Sri Lanka had the noticably higher quantites of roundly 3000 elephants.
In 2004, india had a decrease in the number of elephants to 7500 elephants while this number decreased to 1000 in Malaysia , 5000 in myanmar and 1000 in Thailand. Cambodia is the only country which the number of elephants increased, compared to that of 1997.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 104, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Myanmar
...umber of elephants with 1000 elephants. myanmar was the country which had the second la...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 123, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...his number decreased to 1000 in Malaysia , 5000 in myanmar and 1000 in Thailand. C...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, second, so, third, while, except for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 819.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 166.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.93373493976 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58944267634 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50014162889 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 85.0 106.607317073 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.512048192771 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 225.9 283.868780488 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.8756425503 43.030603864 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.0 112.824112599 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4444444444 22.9334400587 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.66666666667 5.23603664747 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.11077509687 0.215688989381 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0601015131366 0.103423049105 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0610502345391 0.0843802449381 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.086288513876 0.15604864568 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0757365348805 0.0819641961636 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.2329268293 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.76 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 11.4329268293 52% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.