The bar chart gives information about the annual average spending on clothes per person in the US
in 1985, 1995 and 2005
The visuals reveal the information regarding the average amount of money spent annually on clothing per person in America and how these figures altered from 1985 to 2005. Overall, the annual spending on both four examined categories were similar in terms of general proliferation, with women's clothes enjoying the most dramatic rise. Additionally, the annual expenses on women's clothes consistently had the highest figures of all surveyed categories throughout the period
From the value of nearly 500$ per person in 2005, there was initially a rise of 200$ to reach around 700$ in the annual expenditure for women's clothes between 1985 and 2005, ranking first among all examined spendings. Similar changes, but to a lesser extent, were seen in the data for men's clothes, which was 250$ in 1985, after which it experienced a thrive to approximately 430$ in 1995 before witnessing a drop of 30$ to conclude at 400$ in 2005.
Another striking point is that the annual expenses on both boys' and girls' clothes had equal starting figures, which was roughly 80$ in 1985; however, while the average budget for boys' clothes underwent a tedious growth to finish at 90$ in 2005, ranking the lowest of all examined categories, that for girls' clothes witnessed a larger climb of nearly 40$ to end the period at approximately 120$ in 2005.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 26, Rule ID: CURRENCY[1]
Message: The currency mark is usually put at the beginning of the number: '$500'.
Suggestion: $500
...ut the period From the value of nearly 500$ per person in 2005, there was initially...
^^^^
Line 2, column 81, Rule ID: CURRENCY[1]
Message: The currency mark is usually put at the beginning of the number: '$200'.
Suggestion: $200
... in 2005, there was initially a rise of 200$ to reach around 700$ in the annual expe...
^^^^
Line 2, column 102, Rule ID: CURRENCY[1]
Message: The currency mark is usually put at the beginning of the number: '$700'.
Suggestion: $700
...nitially a rise of 200$ to reach around 700$ in the annual expenditure for womens cl...
^^^^
Line 2, column 310, Rule ID: CURRENCY[1]
Message: The currency mark is usually put at the beginning of the number: '$250'.
Suggestion: $250
...in the data for mens clothes, which was 250$ in 1985, after which it experienced a t...
^^^^
Line 2, column 351, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...50$ in 1985, after which it experienced a thrive to approximately 430$ in 1995 before wi...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 377, Rule ID: CURRENCY[1]
Message: The currency mark is usually put at the beginning of the number: '$430'.
Suggestion: $430
...t experienced a thrive to approximately 430$ in 1995 before witnessing a drop of 30$...
^^^^
Line 2, column 418, Rule ID: CURRENCY[1]
Message: The currency mark is usually put at the beginning of the number: '$30'.
Suggestion: $30
...30$ in 1995 before witnessing a drop of 30$ to conclude at 400$ in 2005. Another ...
^^^
Line 2, column 437, Rule ID: CURRENCY[1]
Message: The currency mark is usually put at the beginning of the number: '$400'.
Suggestion: $400
...witnessing a drop of 30$ to conclude at 400$ in 2005. Another striking point is th...
^^^^
Line 3, column 129, Rule ID: CURRENCY[1]
Message: The currency mark is usually put at the beginning of the number: '$80'.
Suggestion: $80
...ual starting figures, which was roughly 80$ in 1985; however, while the average bud...
^^^
Line 3, column 233, Rule ID: CURRENCY[1]
Message: The currency mark is usually put at the beginning of the number: '$90'.
Suggestion: $90
...underwent a tedious growth to finish at 90$ in 2005, ranking the lowest of all exam...
^^^
Line 3, column 351, Rule ID: CURRENCY[1]
Message: The currency mark is usually put at the beginning of the number: '$40'.
Suggestion: $40
...thes witnessed a larger climb of nearly 40$ to end the period at approximately 120$...
^^^
Line 3, column 390, Rule ID: CURRENCY[1]
Message: The currency mark is usually put at the beginning of the number: '$120'.
Suggestion: $120
... 40$ to end the period at approximately 120$ in 2005.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, regarding, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1110.0 965.302439024 115% => OK
No of words: 221.0 196.424390244 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02262443439 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85565412703 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64061171022 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 106.607317073 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.579185520362 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 323.1 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 44.0 22.4926829268 196% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 97.8128825871 43.030603864 227% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 222.0 112.824112599 197% => OK
Words per sentence: 44.2 22.9334400587 193% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 5.23603664747 172% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 12.0 1.69756097561 707% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.294932743399 0.215688989381 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.164859344863 0.103423049105 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0811532146732 0.0843802449381 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.200786280001 0.15604864568 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0479408157925 0.0819641961636 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 24.3 13.2329268293 184% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.28 61.2550243902 58% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.51609756098 200% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 19.3 10.3012195122 187% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.72 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.53 8.06136585366 118% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 20.0 11.4329268293 175% => OK
gunning_fog: 19.6 10.9970731707 178% => OK
text_standard: 20.0 11.0658536585 181% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.