The bar chart provides information about how families in a country spent weekly income in both 1968 and in 2018.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar chart illustrates the data of families’ average weekly spending in six different sectors in one nation over 50 years, starting from 1968.
Overall, it is noticeable that the proportion of mean spending on food, fuel and power, clothing and footwear, and personal goods witnessed a declining trend over 50 years. On the other hand, the percentage of purchasing in transport and leisure increased rapidly from 1968 to 2018. The figure for household goods remained the same for 1968.
In 1968, food was the sector that families in mentioned nation purchased most, at 35%, followed by housing and clothing and footwear with 10% of spending in each sector. Furthermore, the proportion of average expenditure on household and personal goods, transport, and leisure were quite similar, fluctuating between 7% and 8%. Fuel and power acclaimed the last position in annual spending, at 6%, respectively.
In 2018, food was no longer the preferable choice for weekly spending and this sector decreased by 18% to 17%. The figure for leisure raised swiftly, with 13% more than the figure in 1968, and this sector became the most popular annual spending in various families in that country. This was followed by housing and transport, with 18% and 14% in order. Additionally, the data on household goods spending was equivalent to 1968’s figure for weekly purchasing, at 10%, respectively. The proportion for clothing and footwear fell by 5% to 2010’s annual income. Finally, personal goods and fuel and power ranked in the last position, at approximately 5% in each sector.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, furthermore, if, so, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 6.8 250% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1331.0 965.302439024 138% => OK
No of words: 255.0 196.424390244 130% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21960784314 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99608801488 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77176404008 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 106.607317073 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.509803921569 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 373.5 283.868780488 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 3.36585365854 267% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.8794221595 43.030603864 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.384615385 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6153846154 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.61538461538 5.23603664747 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0803264965549 0.215688989381 37% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.032331296305 0.103423049105 31% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.03689283139 0.0843802449381 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0650030664511 0.15604864568 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0376332442718 0.0819641961636 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 11.4140731707 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.23 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 40.7170731707 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.