The bar chart shows men’s and women’s prize money at golf majors in 2010
The bar graph provides information about different amounts of prize money won by men and women in various contests in 2010.
Overall, it is seen clearly from the given bar chart that men earned more prize money than women in all golf majors, where both participated. There are two women competitions, while only one competition, where only men take part.
To starts with, in the ana and Evian championship majors, which were open only to women, winnings were below $500000. In contrast, prize money for the men-only master golf major was nearly two million dollars.
Furthermore, in three championships in which men and women both participated, the open champ, and the PGA, there was a stable similar trend. Men winnings were almost three times higher than women in two competitions, while in the US open they were double. Female prize money fell between $500000 and $800000, whereas men's winner earnings began at under two million dollars. The US open gave the highest number of winnings for both categories.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-10 | nobitaa | 78 | view |
| 2024-11-10 | nobitaa | 78 | view |
| 2024-11-04 | khanhkhanhlhp | view | |
| 2024-11-04 | khanhkhanhlhp | view | |
| 2024-11-04 | khanhkhanhlhp | view |
- The charts below give information about world spending and population 78
- The charts below show the percentage of electricity consumed by di erent sectors in Eastern Australia in 2007 and 2010 73
- The diagram illustrates how bees produce honey Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- In today s world of advanced science and technology we still greatly value our artists such as musicians painters and writers What can art tell us about life that science and technology cannot 61
- Nowadays sports is a big business with high earnings for professional sports people and companies involved both financially and other ways Is this a positive or negative development for sports 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 383, Rule ID: GAVE_GIVE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'give'?
Suggestion: give
... under two million dollars. The US open gave the highest number of winnings for both...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, whereas, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 33.7804878049 62% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 845.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 168.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02976190476 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60020574368 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52924364439 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.607142857143 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 250.2 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 22.9336132627 43.030603864 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 93.8888888889 112.824112599 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6666666667 22.9334400587 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.88888888889 5.23603664747 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.365379435047 0.215688989381 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.148066783237 0.103423049105 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.111963725898 0.0843802449381 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.236863065376 0.15604864568 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0626936665701 0.0819641961636 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.54 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.