The bar chart shows the number of hot dogs and buns are eaten in 15 minutes by the winners of Nathan s Hot Dog Eating Contest in Brooklyn The USA between 1980 and 2010
The given bar chart details the report on Nathan's hotdogs and buns' eating challenge, which lasts for at least 15 minutes and takes place in Brooklyn's coney island every 4th of July, over a period of 30 years from 1980 to 2010.
Looking from the overall perspective, it is readily apparent that in the contest of eating 68 buns, over the period as a whole, the American Joey Chestnut broke the previous record of a Japanese winner( Takeru) during the period end.
According to the given illustration, the United States won the contest successively for 3 years in a row by consuming nearly 10 buns. However, whilst with 19.5 buns, Mexico announced to be the winner in 1983, the consumption of merely half of those proved Germany as the winner in the next year( first female winner Birgit Feldon over the entire period length).
Further, for consecutive 11 years until 1996, the United States won all the contests, with a maximum of 20 buns in 1991. Thereafter, in the following 10 years, all the contests but only one(by the USA in 1999) went in Japan's bucket, with a record of 53.75 buns. By contrast, from 2007 onwards, the United States continued to be the achiever of all the contests, with a record-breaking number of 68 buns in the year 2009.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ng number of 68 buns in the year 2009.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, look, at least
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1038.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 220.0 196.424390244 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.71818181818 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85128510684 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50221389577 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 106.607317073 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.586363636364 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 297.0 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 3.36585365854 267% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 22.4926829268 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 45.7927897363 43.030603864 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 148.285714286 112.824112599 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.4285714286 22.9334400587 137% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.160475574216 0.215688989381 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0694979336928 0.103423049105 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0617076818089 0.0843802449381 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0999901234648 0.15604864568 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0677125290918 0.0819641961636 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.2329268293 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.93 61.2550243902 93% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.69 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.91 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.4329268293 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.9970731707 131% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 11.0658536585 163% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.