The chart and table show the exports earnings and percentage change in values in 2015 and 2016
The chart displays the number of income achieved by selling several products in two different times (2015 and 2016) while the table described the alteration of values from it. Interestingly though, it is measured in billion dollars. At first glance, it was evident that the highest increase was reached by textiles whereas gems and jewellery were slighly decline.
Moving to a more detailed analysis concerning to the bar charts, textiles gained the biggest growth from approximately a quarter to 31% whilst about 31% was attained by agricultural products in the both of times. Next, petroleum and engineered goods were having similar rise, it was under one in twenty with the final amount was same, around 62%. However, the revenue from gems and jewellery had quite fall to 40% in 2016.
Turning to the table’s data, the upper change occured in textiles, followed by engineered goods (15,24% and 8,5%, respectively). Then, petroleum rose 3% when products from agricultural were the smallest rise having percentage below 1%. Finally, 5,18% gotten by gems and jewellery which was a dropping value over the period of time.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 215, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a billion'.
Suggestion: a billion
...Interestingly though, it is measured in billion dollars. At first glance, it was eviden...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 402, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'fallen'.
Suggestion: fallen
...venue from gems and jewellery had quite fall to 40% in 2016. Turning to the table’s...
^^^^
Line 3, column 314, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...ery which was a dropping value over the period of time.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, however, if, then, well, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 941.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 182.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17032967033 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67297393991 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62654029542 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.664835164835 0.547539520022 121% => OK
syllable_count: 282.6 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.2902845712 43.030603864 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.555555556 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2222222222 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.11111111111 5.23603664747 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.135250748953 0.215688989381 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0517427379167 0.103423049105 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0676877648505 0.0843802449381 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.094913881032 0.15604864568 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.053475198341 0.0819641961636 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.97 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.