The bar chart depicts proportion of people in the U.K from 2001 to 2008 who took five portions of fruits and vegetables in a day.
Overall, it is evident that the percentage of females eating five portions of fruits and vegetables increased gardually over the given time reaching the highest value in 2006, and then it decreased slowly. However, the proportion of men and children remained the same for initial three years, and then rose sharply the next year. Following that gradual increase was observed.
As shown in the bar chart, in 2001, 20% of women ate five parts of fruits and vegetables in a day whereas less percentage of male and children took them, approximately over 15% and 10% respectively. The proportion of females increased over the given time period reaching above 30% in 2006, and then decreased slightly in the coming two years.
The percentage of men and children remained the same until 2003, and then increased sharply to just above 20% and 15% respectively in 2004. In 2006, the highest proportion of males eating the given amount of fruits and vegetables were observed, and they were mid-way between 25% and 30%. It declined little bit in the following years. 25% of children ate the specified products in 2007, which was the maximum proportion in the provided time period.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 53, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: K
...t depicts proportion of people in the U.K from 2001 to 2008 who took five portion...
^
Line 7, column 301, Rule ID: LITTLE_BIT[1]
Message: Reduce redundancy by using 'little' or 'bit'.
Suggestion: little; bit
...id-way between 25% and 30%. It declined little bit in the following years. 25% of children...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, then, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 6.8 221% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1089.0 965.302439024 113% => OK
No of words: 221.0 196.424390244 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92760180995 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85565412703 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57946334933 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.488687782805 0.547539520022 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 314.1 283.868780488 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 0.482926829268 1035% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.3920628671 43.030603864 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.9 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.6 5.23603664747 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.256570470145 0.215688989381 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105880971121 0.103423049105 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.161281913322 0.0843802449381 191% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.219770841792 0.15604864568 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.183163644583 0.0819641961636 223% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.44 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.