The chart below contains information provided by Australia s tertiary institutions about the percentage of male and female students who enrolled in different subjects in 1995

Essay topics:

The chart below contains information provided by Australia's tertiary institutions about the percentage of male and female students who enrolled in different subjects in 1995.

The bar chart compares male and female students in Australia in terms of their fields of study in the year of 1995.

Arts and Humanities was the most popular subject among women, with nearly 20% of Australia female chose this subject in 1995, while the percentage of male students studied this was smaller (around 13%). The proportion of women majored in Health was significantly larger than their male counterparts, with a figure of 15% and less than 5% respectively. On the contrary, the difference between the figures for male and female enrolled in Business Studies was much more trivial (8% and 9% respectively). Education also has more female students than males.

The widest gap was seen in Engineering: there are about 19 per cent of men enrolled, which was almost ten-fold of the percentage of women (around 2%). In fields like Computing and Math and Sciences, male students remarkably outnumbered female students as well. 10 per cent of men chose Computing as their major, while women who did the same only accounted for less than 5 per cent of the total female population. And in terms of Maths and Sciences, the proportion of male and female was 14% and 7% respectively.

Overall, female students in Australia were more inclined to enter fields like Art and Humanities, Health, and Education, while majors like Engineering, Computing, and Math and Sciences were more ideal for men.

Votes
Average: 8.7 (2 votes)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 285, Rule ID: AFFORD_VBG[1]
Message: This verb is used with infinitive: 'to compute'.
Suggestion: To compute
...dents as well. 10 per cent of men chose Computing as their major, while women who did the...
^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, well, while, on the contrary

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 6.8 221% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1170.0 965.302439024 121% => OK
No of words: 233.0 196.424390244 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02145922747 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90696013833 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70453019895 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.519313304721 0.547539520022 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 351.0 283.868780488 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.5583886603 43.030603864 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.0 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.2 5.23603664747 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.239808554727 0.215688989381 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108963714392 0.103423049105 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0652280536206 0.0843802449381 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159464750477 0.15604864568 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0663097209483 0.0819641961636 81% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.2329268293 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.76 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.