The bar chart compares urban population growth of three locations on the world in the 1950-2000 period and give additional prediction of 2030.
Overall, it is clear that growth of urban population in Africa was the lowest, while Latin America had the highest figure from 1950 to 2000. Additionally, while Africa and Asia had lower the percentage of urban residents than the whole world, that of Latin America was higher than the global urban dwellers.
From 1950 to 2000, although African and Asian people witnessed increasing trends of urban population from roughly 10% to around 39% and from nearly 13% to 39%, respectively, these figure still were lower than those of the whole world, at precisely 30% in 1950 and nearly 48% in 2000. In contrast, the proportion of residents who settled down in Latin American cities were higher than those of the whole world by approximately 12% in 1950 and 22% in 2000.
In terms of prediction of 2030, while the figure of Africa is expected to grow up 50%, that of Asia was roughly 56%. These figures still are lower than that of the world, at exactly 60%. At the same year, the percentage of urban residents in Latin America is estimated up to 80%, which is significantly higher than that of the world.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, still, well, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1032.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 216.0 196.424390244 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.77777777778 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.83365862548 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49024158567 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.472222222222 0.547539520022 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 303.3 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 57.1336153241 43.030603864 133% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.0 112.824112599 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.0 22.9334400587 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.375 5.23603664747 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.172780212706 0.215688989381 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0945711456829 0.103423049105 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0844164218147 0.0843802449381 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144100145291 0.15604864568 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0971998470594 0.0819641961636 119% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 61.2550243902 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.74 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.75 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.