The chart below gives information about the most common sports played in New Zealand in 2002.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The chart illustrates data about 8 different commonly played sports by girls and boys in New Zealand in 2002. This report will evaluate the data given.
Overall. Swimming was mostly popular among both the genders in New Zealand. Most of the boys preferred playing football whereas the girls enjoyed playing Netball.
In terms of both male and female, swimming was the most common sport with around 13% female and around 23% male participants in 2002. Similarly, 25% of the girls loved netball while less than 25% of the boys loved soccer. However, boys were significantly engaged in playing cricket and martial arts than girls which was around 11% and 9% respectively.
On the other hand, there were no significant differences in the remaining sports. This proportion of girls in athletic games were higher than that of boys while in basketball, nearly 10% of boys used to play this sport. Surprisingly, more than 18% of boys also played other games in New Zealand than the girls which only accounted for 10%.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 248, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... this sport. Surprisingly, more than 18% of boys also played other games in New Z...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, similarly, so, whereas, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 851.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 170.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.00588235294 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61087313685 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48051925583 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.582352941176 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 234.0 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.2173791054 43.030603864 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.1 112.824112599 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0 22.9334400587 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.7 5.23603664747 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.170805018703 0.215688989381 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0807772376489 0.103423049105 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0830150316161 0.0843802449381 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13400139792 0.15604864568 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0763543154676 0.0819641961636 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.2329268293 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 61.2550243902 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.48 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.1 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.