The chart below gives information about the number of social networking sites people used in Canada in 2014 and 2015.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
This bar chart describes about the percentage of people that connected into several social network websites in Canada around 2014 to 2015. Overall, most of people only uses one site for social networking sites in last 2 years.
The growth of used networking site were depending of how many site that pople use. About 22 percent of people in 2014 and 21 percent of people in 2015 were not used any social networking for their activities. This amount is bigger than people who used more than three sites in 2014 and 2015. However, in 2015 the percentage of people who connected with more than 3 networking sites were higher than 2014. Based on the data, in 2015 about 16 percent of people used three sites, for four sites there were additional 3 percent from 2014 to 2015, and the last for five sites were least popular that other amout of sites. On the other hand, one site was the most favourite choice for people around 2014 to 2015, but the percentage in 2015 was deducted to 28 percent. For two sites, the growth for 2014 to 2015 were remained stable, the amount only increased 1 percent in 2015.
In summary, by 2014 and 2015 people only needed to used one site for got actived in social networking sites, they already comfortable enough for only used one site. Nevertheless, the most of sites that people used the least pepular amoung the society.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 149, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the people') or simply say ''most people''.
Suggestion: most of the people; most people
...in Canada around 2014 to 2015. Overall, most of people only uses one site for social networkin...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 36, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
.... The growth of used networking site were depending of how many site that pople use. About ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 58, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun site seems to be countable; consider using: 'many sites'.
Suggestion: many sites
...d networking site were depending of how many site that pople use. About 22 percent of peo...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, nevertheless, so, in summary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1119.0 965.302439024 116% => OK
No of words: 241.0 196.424390244 123% => OK
Chars per words: 4.64315352697 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94007293032 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.2085761426 2.65546596893 83% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.439834024896 0.547539520022 80% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 333.9 283.868780488 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.6401067706 43.030603864 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.727272727 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9090909091 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.54545454545 5.23603664747 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.287241870008 0.215688989381 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.155465713943 0.103423049105 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0452822893147 0.0843802449381 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.24373603087 0.15604864568 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0393602793236 0.0819641961636 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.2329268293 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.63 11.4140731707 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.23 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.