The chart below gives information about southland's main exports in 2000, 20*..,and future projections for 2025.(20*..:for test purposes, use and refer to the current year)

Essay topics:

The chart below gives information about southland's main exports in 2000, 20*..,and future projections for 2025.

(20*..:for test purposes, use and refer to the current year)

The bar chart depicts about southland's three major exports in 2000, 2017, and future projections for 2025.

Overall, it can be seen that the export of dairy products and international tourism are set to rise, while the meat products are predicted to decline in the end.

In detail, the international tourism stood at just over 8 billion in 2000 and gradually swells to 9 billion in 2017. By 2025, the rate will have ballooned to almost 10 billion, which will be the highest total of 2025. For the dairy products, it started the period with 7 billion in 2000. Although the rate was relatively low in 2000, 2017 witnesses a sharp surge, rocketing to nearly 10 billion. Despite soaring, the export is expected to experience a steady slid to about 9.5 billion in the next 8 years.

In contrast, meat products will exhibit an opposite trend, compared to other two products. The export started at 6 billion in 2000 and drops steadily to about 5.5 billion in 2017. Likewise, the product is expected to shrink progressively and finish the span at 5 billion, making it (5 billion) the lowest total of the given term.

Votes
Average: 7.9 (3 votes)
Essays by the user:

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 253, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d to shrink progressively and finish the span at 5 billion, making it 5 billion t...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
likewise, so, well, while, in contrast

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 1.00243902439 399% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 925.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 194.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.76804123711 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73207559907 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57647924445 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.587628865979 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 254.7 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.0161488311 43.030603864 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.5 112.824112599 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4 22.9334400587 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.8 5.23603664747 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.14579764028 0.215688989381 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0736826194169 0.103423049105 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0981329633427 0.0843802449381 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126470145248 0.15604864568 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.13086279975 0.0819641961636 160% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.2329268293 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 77.57 61.2550243902 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.0 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 7.5 out of 9
Category: Very Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 10 10
No. of Words: 194 200
No. of Characters: 885 1000
No. of Different Words: 108 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.732 4.0
Average Word Length: 4.562 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.524 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 62 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 48 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 25 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 12 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 19.4 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 4.716 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.3 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.433 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.648 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.055 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4