The graph shows the proportion of expense for charity of English people by age groups during the period, from 1990 to 2010.
Overall, English people spent more money to charity in 1990 than in 2010 from the ages 18 to 65. Meanwhile, In 2010, they were more generous than 1990 at two last groups, 51 to 65 and over 65.
In 1990, The amount of money to charity in England grew continously from age range 18 to 25 until 36 to 50, 17% to 43%, the highest point of the chart. After that there were two slight fall; from 43 % to 35% and from 35% to 32% in age group 51 to 65 and over 65 respectively.
Turning to 2010, the age group 18 to 25 witnessed a marginal decrease and reached the bottom of the chart with just 7% compared with 17% in 1990. In the next age groups, the figures were also went up contantly like 1990 but less than a little bit and extended to 51 to 65 age group instead of just to 36 to 65 in 1990. The percentage at 51 to 65 group reached nearly 40% in 2010 before diminished to 35% in over 65 age group.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 237, Rule ID: LITTLE_BIT[1]
Message: Reduce redundancy by using 'little' or 'bit'.
Suggestion: little; bit
... up contantly like 1990 but less than a little bit and extended to 51 to 65 age group inst...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 33.7804878049 163% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 827.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 203.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.07389162562 4.92477711251 83% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77462671648 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.14772462593 2.65546596893 81% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.492610837438 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 220.5 283.868780488 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.1 1.45097560976 76% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 25.9323036964 43.030603864 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.375 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.375 22.9334400587 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.5 5.23603664747 48% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.16599682679 0.215688989381 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0973730916857 0.103423049105 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0543104329466 0.0843802449381 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125478052598 0.15604864568 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0266410970648 0.0819641961636 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 88.4 61.2550243902 144% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.1 10.3012195122 69% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 6.62 11.4140731707 58% => Coleman_liau_index is low.
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.74 8.06136585366 84% => OK
difficult_words: 24.0 40.7170731707 59% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.