The chart below gives information on the percentage of
British people giving money to charity by age range for the
years 1990 and 2010.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the
main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar chart illustrates how many British people gave money to charity by age range in 1990 and 2010. Overall in two decade period the percentage of youth and middle aged men who donates noticeably decreased, whilst the percent of elderly increased in the given time frames.
More specifically, regarding the quantity of 18 - 25 years old people were over 15% in 1990, however it considerably dropped to 5% in 2010.
The interest of 26 - 35 years old charitable men and the people who over 65 were almost equal (more than 30%) in 1990, but in 2010 the percentage of former fell to 23%, that of latter rose to over than a third.
As for middle-aged men, they were much active to give a donation in both years. The highest percent among all age groups was viewed on 36 - 50 year olds with 43% in 1990, in this year the percent of 51-65 year olds were 35% similarly with 2010's indicators in the age group of 36 - 50.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-01-21 | Nilufar0506 | 61 | view |
| 2021-01-21 | Nilufar0506 | view |
- The chart below gives information on the percentage of British people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The chart below gives information on the percentage of British people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The chart below gives information about southland s main exports in 2000 20 and future projections for 2025 20 for test purposes use and refer to the current year
- In some countries an increasing number of people are suffering from health problems as a result of eating too much fast food It is therefore necessary for governments to impose a higher tax on this kind of food To what extent do you agree or disagree with 56
- The chat below gives information about Southland s main exports in 2000 2021 and future projection of 2025 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, regarding, similarly, third, as for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 748.0 965.302439024 77% => OK
No of words: 168.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.45238095238 4.92477711251 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60020574368 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.39847955264 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.64880952381 0.547539520022 118% => OK
syllable_count: 216.0 283.868780488 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 48.6951971166 43.030603864 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.666666667 112.824112599 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.0 22.9334400587 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.83333333333 5.23603664747 169% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.225037099696 0.215688989381 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121149380333 0.103423049105 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0795911250427 0.0843802449381 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130104803258 0.15604864568 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0453760496174 0.0819641961636 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.2329268293 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 68.44 61.2550243902 112% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.83 11.4140731707 77% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.84 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.