The chart below show the proportion of British students at one University in England who are able to speak other languages than english in 2000 and 2010. Summaries the information by reporting the main features and make comparison where possible.

Essay topics:

The chart below show the proportion of British students at one University in England who are able to speak other languages than english in 2000 and 2010. Summaries the information by reporting the main features and make comparison where possible.

The following pie chart describe the proportions of British students who can speak other languages than English in one Institute in England in 2000 and 2010.
As an overall trend, Highest proportion of students who cannot speak any other language besides English in both years. Although percentage of students who can an other language, two other language and no other language increased by 5% in 2010, as compared to 20000. While plunged in Spanish and French.
In first pie chart about 2000 almost one-third students could not speak any other language, while Spanish was highest speaking language among British students 20%. Meanwhile, speaking proportion of French and Bilingual students were exactly same 15%. In similar way two another and German percentage was also similar 10%.
However, in second chart of 2010 no other language speakers were still show acclivity of 35%. But in Spanish and French showed cumulative declivity of 15%. On the other hand Bilingual and multilingual percentage risen by 5%. While German-speaking students remained the same.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 20, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: ', the Highest'.
Suggestion: , the Highest
...d in 2000 and 2010. As an overall trend, Highest proportion of students who cannot speak...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 159, Rule ID: AN_OTHER[1]
Message: Did you mean 'another'? This word sequence is usually spelled together.
Suggestion: another
...Although percentage of students who can an other language, two other language and no oth...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 92, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ents could not speak any other language, while Spanish was highest speaking langu...
^^
Line 3, column 108, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'was the highest'.
Suggestion: was the highest
...peak any other language, while Spanish was highest speaking language among British student...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 72, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'showed', 'shown'.
Suggestion: showed; shown
...0 no other language speakers were still show acclivity of 35%. But in Spanish and Fr...
^^^^
Line 4, column 137, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... in Spanish and French showed cumulative declivity of 15%. On the other hand Bili...
^^
Line 4, column 226, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...nd multilingual percentage risen by 5%. While German-speaking students remained the s...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, however, second, so, still, third, while, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 1.00243902439 399% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 898.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 168.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.34523809524 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60020574368 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63574224616 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.559523809524 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 257.4 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 1.07073170732 560% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.4890846459 43.030603864 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.6363636364 112.824112599 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.2727272727 22.9334400587 67% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.81818181818 5.23603664747 149% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 1.69756097561 412% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.354192103575 0.215688989381 164% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.134889127833 0.103423049105 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.123853090989 0.0843802449381 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.261631361134 0.15604864568 168% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.107549340288 0.0819641961636 131% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.2329268293 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 10.3012195122 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.16 11.4140731707 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.67 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.