The chart below show the proportions of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English, in 2000 and 2002

Essay topics:

The chart below show the proportions of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English, in 2000 and 2002

The presented circular layouts depict the information about the pecentage of British university pupils able to speak six languages other than English over a 10 year period from 2000 and 2010. Collaboration of data was done in per centum. It is a clear and coherent representation.

Overall,it is evident that the both charts experienced a fluctuations trend over a given period. Spanish was the only language which was significantly spoken by the students, while the German language had same profile in both years.

At first glance it is clear that the Spanish language made up the largest part of the chart in years 2000 and 2010 which accounted for 30% and 35% respectively.German only remained same in both years at 10%.The French only had been went down in 2010 which represents 10% from 20% in year 2000.

The three languages: German, French and no other languages had same percentile which claimed at 10% in the year 2010.There were a slight difference of 5% in the given time period not only by another language but also two other languages.

Votes
Average: 9.6 (3 votes)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 8, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , it
...and coherent representation. Overall,it is evident that the both charts experie...
^^^
Line 5, column 161, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: German
... accounted for 30% and 35% respectively.German only remained same in both years at 10%...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 208, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...only remained same in both years at 10%.The French only had been went down in 2010 ...
^^^
Line 7, column 118, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: There
...e which claimed at 10% in the year 2010.There were a slight difference of 5% in the g...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, so, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 882.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 178.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.95505617978 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65262427087 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87108883828 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.606741573034 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 253.8 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 89.0519224832 43.030603864 207% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 126.0 112.824112599 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.4285714286 22.9334400587 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.42857142857 5.23603664747 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.187056498941 0.215688989381 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0768007779979 0.103423049105 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0749309648536 0.0843802449381 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118376960985 0.15604864568 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0463202458652 0.0819641961636 57% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.