The chart below shows that Anthropology graduates from one university did after finishing their undergraduate degree course. The table shows the salaries of the anthropologists in work after five years.
Summarise information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The pie chart illustrates the career prospect of bachelor of Anthropology after completing the study program in their university, whereas the table depicts how much wages they can earn after five years. Overall, it can be observed from the pie chart is that a significant number of of anthropologists had full-time work. It is also noticeable that almost anthropologists received a high salaries in whatever type of employment after 5 years’ work.
According to the pie chart, the proportion of graduate doing full-time work covered more than a half of the total. This is followed by the figure of part-time worker (15%) and the unemployed (12%). While the percentage of people who do the part-time work and study postgrad simultaneously made up the least number at 5%, that of the not known and the full-time worker studying postgrad occupied at the same amount which was 8%.
When it comes to the table, although a large number of anthropologists working in government sector (50%) and freelance consultants (40%) received more than $100.000, the percentage of graduates working in private companies receiving $50.000-$74.999 made up the largest amount (35%) in comparision with other salaries. Besides, just a small number of anthrologists earned $25.000-$49.999 after 5 years of working in these three type of employment.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 161, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
...iversity, whereas the table depicts how much wages they can earn after five years. O...
^^^^
Line 1, column 280, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: of
... pie chart is that a significant number of of anthropologists had full-time work. It ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 38, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
.... When it comes to the table, although a large number of anthropologists working in government s...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 321, Rule ID: SMALL_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, use 'a few', or use 'some'
Suggestion: a few; some
...sion with other salaries. Besides, just a small number of anthrologists earned 5.000-9.999 after ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, if, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1100.0 965.302439024 114% => OK
No of words: 212.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18867924528 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81578560438 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05804473372 2.65546596893 115% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 106.607317073 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.608490566038 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 322.2 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 71.4225979645 43.030603864 166% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.5 112.824112599 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.5 22.9334400587 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.625 5.23603664747 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.197319909488 0.215688989381 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0915708698583 0.103423049105 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0638014507369 0.0843802449381 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135814838582 0.15604864568 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0950052055097 0.0819641961636 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.2329268293 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 11.4140731707 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.87 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.