The given line graph well illustrates how often were three various types of crime (burglary, car thieft and robbery) in Newport happened, in number of incidents, from 2003 to 2012. It can be clearly seen that there are two main trends in this graph: downward and unstable.
In details, started with approximately 3400 in the beginning, the amount of incidents in burglary then rose to 3700 one year later, before falling down dramatically to 1100 in the year of 2008, respectively. It then had a slight growth to nearly 1500 in 2009 and remained unchanged until the end of the period.
Meanwhile, for the number of car theft activities, after staying at 2700 in the first two years, it had a sharp decrease to almost 2000 in 2006. In the next five years, it went up slowly and broke the 2500 milestone. It ended the period by hitting its starting point.
Lastly, the probability in robbery contributed a small part of the graph. It was fluctuated between the range of 500 and 1000 in the whole period.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, lastly, then, well, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 826.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 177.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.66666666667 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64748333727 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56786963903 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 106.607317073 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.677966101695 0.547539520022 124% => OK
syllable_count: 234.0 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 1.53170731707 392% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 51.1507092984 43.030603864 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.7777777778 112.824112599 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6666666667 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.11111111111 5.23603664747 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0510919866862 0.215688989381 24% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0159026961336 0.103423049105 15% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0355361493782 0.0843802449381 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0269465674037 0.15604864568 17% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0466728238328 0.0819641961636 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 77.57 61.2550243902 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.81 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.79 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.