The pie chart illustrates the annual percentage of GDP growth for Tunisia, Japan and Ecuador in the time span between 2007 and 2010.
Overall, it is clear from the chart that Japan reached the maximum of GDP growth in 2010 whereas the least amount was obtained by Ecuador in 2009. Furthermore, Japan and Tunisia show an opposite behaviour since the first country rose its GDP growth all over the years while instead the second country decreased it. Differently, Ecuador saw a rise from 2007 to 2008 but then dropped considerably until started to re-increase.
In 2007, the annual GDP growth was just above 6% in Tunisia while the one of Japan was only 2 percent but it began to increase significantly so that in 2008 it almost reached the value of Tunisia with a figure of 4%. In 2009, Japan overtook of 2% Tunisia, which had a GDP growth close to 3%, and continued to rise so that one year later Japan had pretty much the initial value of Tunisia in 2007 while Tunisia had remained quite steady.
As concerned to Ecuador, this country began in 2007 with a figure of 3% then rose to nearly 5% by 2008 However, in the following year there was a huge decline of around the 4 percent. Things get better in 2010 when the GDP growth per year was about 2%.
- The diagram below shows how geothemal energy is used to produce electricity. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 86
- Modern lifestyles mean that many parents have little time for their children. Many children suffer because they do not get as much attention from their parents as children did in the past 84
- The charts give information about two genres of TV programmes watched by men and women and four different age groups in Australia. 33
- Some people choose to eat no fish or meat. They believe that this is not better for your own health but also benefits the world as whole. Discuss these view and give your own opinion. 89
- The charts below show the reasons why people travel to work by bicycle or by car.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, however, if, second, so, then, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1032.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 228.0 196.424390244 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.52631578947 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88582923847 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.34973132587 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 106.607317073 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.539473684211 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 299.7 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 48.7852436706 43.030603864 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.0 112.824112599 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.5 22.9334400587 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.75 5.23603664747 167% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.214779512831 0.215688989381 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113452555248 0.103423049105 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0638247264635 0.0843802449381 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159430221496 0.15604864568 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0525094791944 0.0819641961636 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 68.44 61.2550243902 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.29 11.4140731707 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.45 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.