The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The column chart below indicates the frequency American had consumed fast food in restaurants over the 10-year period, from 2003 to 2013. It is apparent that the proportion of people choosing junk food once a week and once a month overweighted other choices.
Initially, the rate of eater never of daily having fast food experienced the similar results over the period surveyed, under 5% in all 3 years recorded, 2003, 2006 and 2013. Moreover, the number of guests visited junk food restaurants a few times a year in 2006 and 2013 witnessed the same figures. Otherwise, the data analysed that people used these food several times a week in same years saw a contrast tendency. In comparison with 2006, the number of consumers in 2013 recorded the lower statistics, around 15%.
The biggest proportion among all figures surveyed belonged to the number of people chose to have junk food once or twice a month in 2013, more than one-third. Compared with the lowest rate, which is the total of people consumed fast food every day, the biggest one was approximately seventh. However, the number of people decided to go to the fast food restaurants once or twice per month in 2006 witnessed the lowest statistics among three years recorded, around one-fourth.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 12, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'charts'.
Suggestion: charts
The column chart below indicates the frequency American ...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 193, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to junk'
Suggestion: to junk
... that the proportion of people choosing junk food once a week and once a month overw...
^^^^
Line 2, column 345, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this food' or 'these foods'?
Suggestion: this food; these foods
...ise, the data analysed that people used these food several times a week in same years saw ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 419, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: comparison,
... same years saw a contrast tendency. In comparison with 2006, the number of consumers in 2...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, moreover, so, third
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1044.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 211.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94786729858 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81127787577 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57947940051 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.549763033175 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 310.5 283.868780488 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.2720806603 43.030603864 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.0 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4444444444 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.11111111111 5.23603664747 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.194456808418 0.215688989381 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0909147913684 0.103423049105 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0428350745967 0.0843802449381 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147860802684 0.15604864568 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0286343750146 0.0819641961636 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.2329268293 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.73 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.29 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.