The chart below shows information about fuel used in the transport sector in different countries in Europe, compared to the EU average, in 2009 and 2010.
The change in the fuel use for the sector of transportation in six different European nations in comparison to the EU average from 2009 to 2010 is displayed in the bar chart, shown in percentage.
Overall, the average of EU fuel consumption in the initial year is higher than it in the next period. However, Slovakia and Spain witnessed a downward trend of fuel usage, while other countries showed some changes.
Initially, the consumed fuel average for transportation in Europe accounted for 6%, and the highest proportion was Slovakia, almost reaching 9%. Meanwhile, Austria used approximately 5% of the energy in this sector, being larger than Italy, with a gap of 0, 5%. Furthermore, the other nations stood below 4%.
Eventually, the usage of this energy in Europe decreased of a percent. Additionally, a dramatic fall was experienced by Slovakia to slightly over 6%, followed by Spain at around a half of the former, then the rate of Austria usage remained stable. This contrasted to the aforementioned states, that of Italy and France increased moderately by only one percent, while although that of Greece also inclined, it was still below a third of the maximum data recorded, being the lowest.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, however, if, so, still, then, third, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1013.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 200.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.065 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76060309309 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92488888678 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.61 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 315.0 283.868780488 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.670805949 43.030603864 132% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.555555556 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2222222222 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.77777777778 5.23603664747 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.2988071716 0.215688989381 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104234589775 0.103423049105 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101069838937 0.0843802449381 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.183512016091 0.15604864568 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.117889482744 0.0819641961636 144% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.2329268293 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 61.2550243902 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.62 8.06136585366 119% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 40.7170731707 152% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.