The chart below shows the number of jobs in tourism-related industries in one UK city between 1989 and 2009
The bar chart gives information about the change in the profession of four main tourism-related industries in a specific UK city from 1989 to 2009.
Overall, it is clear from the chart that the number of occupations coming from restaurants increased whilst the opposite was true for travel and tours, and sport and leisure.
In 1989, tourism-related works appeared mostly in restaurants standing at the first position among four fields with more than 1100 following to hotels with a slightly lower figure of 1050, sport and leisure with 900 and travel and tours with 800. The dominance of restaurant jobs was replaced in 1994, since there were nearly 1400 employments in hotels that higher 100 than that of restaurants. However, this peak did not last too long as the number of vacancies which was contributed by hotels started to drop steadily, finishing at around 1050 in 2009. Conversely, more and more professions in restaurants were generated, reaching the apex of 1600 in 2004 before experiencing a step back to just about 1300 in 2009.
In regard to sport and leisure, its recorded data fluctuated widely over the years, falling to 650 in 2009 similar to 1994. With the rest of industry, travel and tours, the demand for it only increased one time to 1050 in the first five years after that declined dramatically with 400 jobs in 2009.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, first, however, if, in regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 50.0 33.7804878049 148% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1124.0 965.302439024 116% => OK
No of words: 228.0 196.424390244 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9298245614 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88582923847 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71493708007 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 106.607317073 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.605263157895 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 313.2 283.868780488 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 33.841542518 43.030603864 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.5 112.824112599 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.5 22.9334400587 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.125 5.23603664747 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.218280428022 0.215688989381 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.090424763307 0.103423049105 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0964974277132 0.0843802449381 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147794826895 0.15604864568 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.112167094995 0.0819641961636 137% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.2329268293 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.98 61.2550243902 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.8 10.3012195122 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.61 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.49 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.