The chart below shows the number of trips made by children in one country in 1990 and 2010 to travel to and from school using different modes of transport.
The bar graph illustrates the various type of different transport students took in order to travel to school and return home namely car, walking, cycling and bus in one specific country during 1990 and 2010.
Overall, the majority students walked to school and back home in the year 1990 then as the time passed more transport options were introduced and children preferred cars as the main travel option in 2010 as seen in the graph.
Upon further investigation, in 1990 around 4 million students were taking car rides in order to reach school. The number of children walking was the highest, recording approximately 12 million trips. The remaining three modes of travel were at a similar level, around 6 million.
Moving to 2010, The students who preferred walking decreased significantly to exactly 6 million which meant rise in car trips recording around 11 million trips. The remaining travel option were lowered when compared to 1990 with cycling registering the lowest students of exactly 2 million.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 292, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e lowest students of exactly 2 million.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 853.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 165.0 196.424390244 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1696969697 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58402463422 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60862453158 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.587878787879 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 241.2 283.868780488 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.9146405419 43.030603864 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.857142857 112.824112599 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5714285714 22.9334400587 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.14285714286 5.23603664747 22% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.226451948835 0.215688989381 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106107455814 0.103423049105 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0613230120815 0.0843802449381 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147857939133 0.15604864568 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0579109314782 0.0819641961636 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.2329268293 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 11.4140731707 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.